Abstract
The judgement concluded:
"Three declarations are sought in this case: (1) that Métis and non‑status Indians are “Indians” under s. 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867; (2) that the federal Crown owes a fiduciary duty to Métis and non‑status Indians; and (3) that Métis and non‑status Indians have the right to be consulted and negotiated with."
Publication Information
The Canadian Legal Information Institute. "Daniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 1 SCR 99, 2016 SCC 12 (CanLII).
https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2016/2016scc12/2016scc12.html?autocompleteStr=daniels%20v.%20canada&autocompletePos=1
Publication Date
2016
Primary Resource
Secondary
Resource Type