Integration & Mobility

DIA Denies Band Permission to Attend Fairs

Summary

Through a 1914 amendment to the Indian Act, First Nations people who wished to travel off-reserve for fairs or stampedes were required to obtain permission from the Indian agent. Throughout the years up to 1918, Department of Indian Affairs officials routinely refused to grant approval for off reserve events. Through the 1920s, officials were more lenient with granting these passes and fair organizers were less inclined to respect the instructions of the DIA.

Implications
Although it was legal for First Nations people to travel off-reserve to participate in settler fairs, Indian Affairs' refusal to grant passes that allowed them to do so was an attempt to surveil and control the activities of Indigenous peoples.
Sources
Date
1914-00-00

Rebellion Losses Committee

Summary

In the aftermath of the North West/Riel Resistance the Rebellion Losses Commission was established to provide compensation to those who had suffered losses as a result of the armed conflict. The general opinion of the commission’s members was that “having contributed to their own losses, the Métis were not eligible for any compensation.” Many Metis were angered that those who implicated Metis individuals in the resistance were provided with compensation for their losses - this demonstrates the government's efforts to consolidate power by implementing various means of rewarding or punishing its allies and enemies.

Implications
Generally, the Metis population whose lands, horses, food and property had been destroyed or stolen by the North West Field Force during the North West Resistance received no compensation. Many Metis suffered economically and were pushed into poverty due to the aftermath and the failure to compensate losses. Please see entry below in "relevant resources" for details as to how Metis women who made claims through the Rebellion Losses Commission were denied compensation. Please also see an entry on the Metis road allowance in this database for further information on the impacts of poverty and land dispossession for Metis people.
Sources

AM, MG3, C14, Capt. George H. Young, Notes Regarding Royal Commission on Rebellion Losses, 1886.

Sub Event
Provisioning of Relief
Date
1886-02-00

Meeting with HBC at Fort Carlton to determine where the Metis would home

Summary

Meeting at Fort Carlton including local Metis elders chaired by HBC representative Lawrence Clark with the purpose of selecting a site for a new Metis settlement. Eventually, an area centered on the St. Laurent de Grandin mission on the west bank of the South Saskatchewan River was selected.

Implications
This meeting led to a high volume of Metis migrating to the South Saskatchewan River area in the following years.
Sources

PAA, OMI, Little chronicle of St. Laurent, Introduction (translation).

Date
1870-12-31

Native American Church Ceremony on Red Pheasant

Summary

An all-night ritual took place near the Red Pheasant reserve featuring 15 members of the Native American Church, 13 members of the Stony Reserve (Alberta) and Red Pheasant Band, and peyote. Non-Indigenous observers were also present.

Implications
Peyote, a hallucinogenic plant, was being transported into Canada from the US. As it was relatively unknown by authorities and not classified as a narcotic, posessors of peyote could not be prosecuted under the provisions of the federal Narcotics Act. In 1941, the Department attempted to control the import of peyote into Canada by requesting police surveillance of known users and by investigating the possibility of prosecution under the Customs Act or Drug and Food Act. Police monitoring was considerd the most effective means of control, since the use of peyote was limited to a few reserves. Government officials did not have any legal authority to suppress Aboriginal spiritual practices, although they did have the power to hinder the use of peyote. This created a legal, religious and moral debate regarding the rights of Aboriginal people to use peyote in their ceremonies, and the role of the Canadian state in control of the substance and rituals. Prohibition of peyote and Indigenous spiritual practices represented a privileging of Christian religious institutions as being the primary expression of legitimate spirituality in Saskatchewan - a Eurocentric belief that emanated from the Doctrine of Discovery and resulted in the oppression of Indigenous philosophy from Contact onwards.
Sources

Saskatoon Star Pheonix, "White Men Witness Indian Peyote Rites," 13 October 1956.

Date
1956-10-00
Community

RCMP Sunchild Report Circulated to Indian Agents

Summary

In 1952, the ritual consumption of peyote related to the activities of the Native American Church was reported among members of the Cree band led by Louis Sunchild. Sunchild, an Alberta First Nation leader, was stopped at the Montana-Alberta border carrying peyote. RCMP took him into custody, and although he was released, the peyote was retained and the report and images of his peyote stash were circulated to Indian Agents across Western Canada.

Implications
Although they no longer had legal power to suppress Aboriginal spiritual practices, the RCMP and Indian Agents attempted to control the spread of peyote through Western Canada. This would have restricted or inhibited Aboriginal peoples from practicing cultural and religious traditions, thus continuing to extend colonialism into the cultural practices of Aboriginal peoples.
Sources

Memo from Lethbridge sub-division. 19 March. 1/1-16-2, 10243, T-7545, RG10. Indian Affairs fonds. LAC.

Date
1952-00-00

Metis Outmigration from Manitoba

Summary

Several factors combined to incite a spike in outmigration of Metis peoples between 1872-1874 from the Red River region. They include: delays and frustrations over the slow granting of Metis land promised in the Manitoba Act, poor crop returns in the early 1870s and high Metis mortality resulting from social determinants of health such as malnutrition and psychological stress. The factors which undermined agricultural success in Red River are outlined below in the "The Metis Nation: Buffalo Hunting vs. Agriculture in the Red River Settlement" entry under "relevant resources."

Result

D.N. Sprague along with other historians have argued that government mistreatment, most notably the systematic, strategic or deliberate delays in providing Metis peoples with land—as was agreed under the Manitoba Act—influenced this migration. Diane Payement indicates that another factor that may have influenced Metis migrations from Manitoba was their loss of political power in the province as more Euro-Canadian settlers entered the new province. Using various examples, Gerhard Ens argues that the government’s delays in settling with Metis land claims influenced the outmigration, but argues the delays were not deliberate and were not the only factor that incited the migrations. However, Sprague notes that John A. MacDonald disclosed his plans to delay land distribution through scrip in correspondence with John Rose in February of 1870: " “these impulsive half breeds have got spoilt by their emeute [riot], and must be kept down by a strong hand until they are swamped by the influx of settlers." One of the ways in which this "strong hand" was maintained was through the denial of community control of land claims - another is ongoing amendments to the Manitoba Act.

Implications
Many French Metis individuals migrated from Manitoba into present-day Saskatchewan, largely to pursue remaining bison herds further west.
Date
1872-00-00

Metis Treatment after the First World War

Summary

In the post First World War period the Metis population faced continued neglect. They were not included as a distinct people in the census, and neither the federal or provincial government wanted to take responsibility for the broken promises of the Riel or Red River Resistances as it related to Metis rights to land and livelihood (please see database entries on the scrip distribution process and speculation/government fraud).

Implications
After the First World War, Métis families were given the ability to purchase homesteads. The Land Improvement District authorities had permission to confiscate the land if ten acres were not broken within three years. As Metis families were poor and could not afford farming equipment to break the land, the lands were reclaimed by the authorities and the cycle of poverty was reinforced. Thus, the Metis drifted back to the road lines and Crown lands where they would build shacks. Their confinement to road allowances led to their being called "road allowance people" (please see database entry on "Road Allowance People").
Date
1918-00-00

Cypress Hills Cree Forced to Leave

Summary

Cree groups living in the Cypress Hills were told by Indian Affairs officials that they were not going to be issued rations until they left the region and moved onto reserves in the Qu'Appelle, Battleford, and Fort Pitt areas. This was part of the 'Sheer Compulsion' strategy. They were issued rations at Fort Walsh to fuel their journey to Prince Albert, and received more rations for the final portion of their journey. Big Bear and a group of followers remained at their camp about twenty miles from Fort Walsh into 1882, and were some of the last to accept the move out of the Cypress Hills.

Implications
This was a move towards the "ethnic cleansing" of the Southwest portion of province, with approximately 5,000 Indigenous people people displaced from the Cypress Hills during that year. The forced removal of the Cree from their territory in the Cypress Hills region is similar to the forced relocations of other Indigenous groups onto reserve land not chosen by the group themselves (as dictated in treaties). The Canadian Government's approach was meant to segregate/assimilate Indigenous peoples from their home territories in order for colonial settlement of the West, part of MacDonald's National Policy.
Sources

Saskatchewan Herald, 24 June 1882, 1. Debates of the House of Commons, March 24, 1882, p. 542-543. Report of John C. Nelson, Dominion Land Surveyor, December, 1882, PAC RG-10, Vol. 3621, f. 4754.

Date
1882-03-24

Flood of Immigrants into the West

Summary

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries the flood of homesteaders pushed Metis peoples in present-day Saskatchewan to the fringes of society. Their culture and way of life were not accepted, and as a result many Metis peoples in southern Saskatchewan were forced onto road allowances. In doing so, the ability of Metis families to establish community roots and their ability to obtain financial prosperity was severely restricted. As a result, these people often worked as seasonal or casual workers on farms, in towns or in the bush. This also greatly restricted educational opportunities, which, when combined with a lack of stability, perpetuated a cycle of poverty that was difficult to escape. (See Mark Calette Interview, and Emergence of Metis as Road Allowance People - Living Conditions).

Implications
Destitution as well as cultural degradation as the European settlers that migrated to Canada created an assimilatory environment where Metis peoples began to identify themselves as either French or English, not Metis. Aside form the affects of assimilationist pressures, the continued dispersal of families kept Metis people at the margins of society. As a result, it was easy for provincial governments to relocate Metis people as they saw fit (see entry on the The Relocation of Little Chicago Residents to Green Lake).
Sub Event
Impact on Southern Saskatchewan Metis Communities
Date
1890-00-00

Metis Migration Following the North-West Resistance (North-West Rebellion)

Summary

In the aftermath of the North-West Resistance many Metis peoples migrated to different places across the North American West. Many headed to around Battleford and Prince Albert to work as freighters, trappers, and fishermen. Communities included Marcelin, Leask, Birch Hills, Kinistino, Onion Lake, Glaslyn and Meadow Lake. Additionally, many Metis moved to North Dakota and some even to southern Alberta to work as ranchers.

Implications
The impact of this one event has been felt throughout the province of Saskatchewan ever since the Rebellion / Resistance. In an interview conducted for Parks Canada, Mark Calette explains the true impact that this had on the Metis community, when asked about the Metis connections to Fort Battleford, Fort Walsh, and Grasslands National Park --- "For me, it’s the connection with the Trottier family. I think it relates back to 1885, and obviously it would probably be prior to that too, but certainly, when my family left the Batoche and Round Prairie areas, and scooted to the US and had to seek asylum there until things got better … and then came back, using Highway 4 again as that connector route. That’s why you see the Trottier family scattered right from Val Marie, through Biggar, Cando, Meadow Lake, Glaslyn… It’s all along that highway, and all the way down. So, you’ll see the family remnants all the way, right from the American border, all the way up. Then we also have the connection with my great-grandfather being born in Maple Creek, so that’s our connection to the southwest, and to the US because I still have cousins in the northern US..." --- This dispersal of people also had great consequences for generations to come. Mark mentions the hardships of his father, and previous generations of his family after the Resistance " ---- "... Dad, and our Grandma, and our Kokum, they all did. In fact, if you want to use Highway 4 as kind of, the connector route, right from the American border down near Val Marie, right up, if you take Highway 4, right on up to past the Battlefords, and into Glaslyn, that was the route that they often travelled and live on. Dad speaks of stories of living on the road allowance and never living anywhere long enough to get an education …" As can be seen through these statements, the impact on Metis people was not insignificant, but can be viewed as one of the major catalysts for the economic, social, and political issues that the Metis community has faced in the 20th, and early 21st centuries.
Sub Event
The Beginning of the Road Allowance
Fill

The Beginning of the Road Allowance 

Date
1885-00-00