Sexual Abuse in Residential Schools

Summary

Many students experienced sexual abuse at the hands of school faculty, local clergy members, lay persons from the local community, and other students. Some victims of sexual assault in Residential Schools have remained silent about their experiences for multiple reasons, including shame, fear of disbelief, and symptoms of psychological trauma that are harmful to retell to the survivors. However, given the number of survivors who have reported sexual assault, and the extensive research already collected on the conditions of Residential schools, it is inarguable that sexual violence was widespread throughout the institutions, having immediate and long-term effect on Indigenous peoples and their communities. This is affirmed by Mel H. Buffalo, an adviser to the Samson band in Alberta, who says that "every Indian person I have spoken to who attended these schools has a story of mental, physical or sexual abuse.". Several incidents of sexual abuse and neglect occurred under Principle McWhinney at the Crowstand IRS. Following incidents of abuse in 1914, D. C. Scott, Deputy Superintendent of Indian Affairs, instructed that female students be sent home. It was deemed the institution was no longer safe to continue mixed education of boys and girls.


 

Result

Sexual violence/abuse was recorded since the beginning of Residential Schools in the late nineteenth century. Abuse was usually ignored or covered up by school and church authorities. Those that were addressed rarely went beyond the perpetrator being told to stop with no further action taken. It was not until the late 1980s and early 1990s that allegations of sexual exploitation/assault by faculty were treated seriously with a number of investigations, arrests, and convictions. While there has been some institutional response from the federal government and church in more recent years, there continues to be barriers in acquiring support and compensation for many survivors and the long-term impacts of Residential Schooling. One ongoing legal battle the federal government has spent 3.2 million dollars against since 2013 are the survivors of St. Anne’s residential school in Ontario. Survivors have asked for a renegotiation of compensation terms after new information “documenting the serious nature of the sexual and physical abuse rampant at St Anne’s” (Royal Canadian Geographical Society, A Fight For Truth) was released following the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. The federal government denies that larger compensation is owed. This demonstrates the continuation of settler colonial violence against survivors and the wavering commitment of the Canadian Government to engage in true reconciliation with Indigenous peoples.  


RG-10 RECORDS AND DOCUMENT SUMMARY

 

RG10, C- 8147, Vol. 6027, File 117-1-1, part 1; Title: Agent Blewett to Secretary, 21 July, 1914.

Regarding the investigation into the hapenning at Crowstand school in March and May of 1914. "From statements, of five of the larger girls, signed by these girls in the presence of witnesses, I find that during March last H. Everett, then farmer at the school, entered the girls dormitory alone on two nights and spent some time in the company of two girls in seperate beds. A few nights after this, Everett, with five boys from the Reserve adjacent, entered the same dormitory and spent about half an hour there, each boy (except one who had no girls) got into bed with one of the girls. The girls deny that any immoral acts were committed, but in the case of three older ones, I doubt the truth if this. In May last, from statements signed by Harriet Papequosh and Clara Fiddler, Everett had these two girls, seperatly in his private room, and locked the doors and had sexual intercourse with them." Regarding principle Mc Whinney being sick at the time of the investigation: "I found out after that he knew of the irregularities and had dismissed Everett, so that before I had definite facts to proceed on, Everett had left this district. I will try to bring him to justice. I would like advice as to what I had better do regarding the Reserve men who were in the school with Everett that night. The girls in question are 14 and 15 years old." Regarding Crowstand school: "The School Building at Crowstand is not at all suitable for good, safe and healthy work and if the Boarding School is to be continued a new school should be built at the earliest possible moment, before more serious things happen.


RG10, C- 8147, Vol. 6027, File 117-1-1, part 1; Title: Agent Blewett to Secretary, August 25, 1914.

 

"After giving the matter careful consideration, Scott concludes that it would not be well to continue the co-education of the sexes in this school any longer. For this reason it has been decided to return the girls to their parents so that their mothers may be in a position to look after them until other suitable arrangements can be made for their education. The school may be kept for the boys exclusively and Mr. McWhinney is being instructed to discharge all the girls and return them to their homes. Scott does not accept the responsibility of condoning McWhinney's treatment of the Everett incident. Scott believes McWhinney is no longer of great use at Crowstand as the Indians have no confidence in his management of the school."


   RG10, C- 8147, Vol. 6027, File 117-1-1, part 1; Title: D.C. Scott to A. Grant, 19 September, 1914.

Regarding the irregularities reported at Crowstand School: "I beg to say that I am pleased to learn, on final hearing in court, from the girls concerned, that the reserve boys were not in the dormitories as formerly reported, but were trying to get in only. As it was on oath we must believe it, although Mr. Bradford and myself thought it the case of all but two there were doubts, however we accepted it and hope it is true. Mr McWhinney has written me stating that Everett confessed to him before he was dismissed, that he had immoral relations with the girls in question, but being unwell at the time and hoping the young man would be benifited by this lesson, he sent him from the school and closed the matter up." In a correspondence dated 19 September, 1914 to Reverend Andrew Grant from the Deputy Superintendent General, it is noted that the girls were eventually sent home from the Crowstand school, and it became a only boys school until further arrangements were made.


 

Sources
  • Baiguzhiyeva, Dariya. “St Anne’s residential school survivors reject Ottawa’s request for independent review.” TIMMINSTODAY.com. March 26, 2021. https://www.timminstoday.com/local-news/st-annes-residential-schoolsurvivorsreject-ottawas-request-for-independent-review-3578450
  • Capitaine, Brieg, and Vanthuyne, Karine, eds. Power through Testimony: Reframing Residential Schools in the Age of Reconciliation. Vancouver: UBC Press,  2017. 321.
  • Milloy, John S. A National Crime: The Canadian Government and the Residential School System, 1879 to 1986. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, 1999. 144-145.
  • Miller, J. R. Shingwauk's Vision: A History of Native Residential Schools. Toronto; Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1996. 337-338.
  • Royal Canadian Geographical Society, Issuing Body. “A Fight for Truth.” In, Indigenous Peoples Atlas of Canada = Atlas Des Peuples Autochtones Du Canada. First ed. Aboriginal Education Collection. 2018. https://indigenouspeoplesatlasofcanada.ca/article/a-fight-for-truth/ 

 

 

Fill

 

Date
1876-00-00
Region
Church

Construction of Island Falls Dam

Summary

The Churchill River Power Company established a dam on the Churchill River at Island Falls, near Sandy Bay, to supply power to the Hudson's Bay Mining and Smelting mine in Flin Flon, Manitoba. The mine began receiving power from the dam in 1930. The company claims that in 1928 it held public hearings concerning the project, and that there was not a community established at that location until after the dam was constructed and Aboriginal inhabitants moved closer to the project for work. The Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation states that they had established a reserve on that location before the dam project started, but once the company expressed interest in the land the federal government took the reserve lands from the band. The project employed many Cree workers. The working conditions for these employees were usually very poor, and they were often paid in rations rather than money. Between 1930-35, Etienne MacDonald (1984), Moise Bear (1984) and Mathew Nateweyes (1984) confirmed that the Cree workers were being paid in groceries at a rate equivalent to thirty cents an hour. In addition, overtime hours, which were frequent, were not remunerated. In 1935, workers on the dam successfully organized to raise their pay to 35 cents an hour (in cash) and reduce work hours to an eight hour day.

The herbicides used were very powerful. They made the workers tired and sleepy, yet they were unable to sleep because of the itching. The herbicide killed both trees and animals. Women were therefore asked not to pick berries from the powerline area. The water quality was also affected, as garbage and sewage were often dumped in the river. Some residents recall the high number of infant and child related sickness and death during this period.

Sandy Bay was only two miles away from the dam, it did not receive power from it at first. It was only in 1958 that the people of Sandy Bay got a powerline.


 

Fill

 

Date
1926-00-00

Indian Act Amendment

Summary

In 1920 the Superintendent General was given the power to decide whether a woman who had lost status through marriage was eligible to live on reserve. Until this time, this power had belonged to the band council. It also became the role of the Superintendent General to approve the payment of annuities to an Aboriginal woman who lost status through marriage. Until this time, she would automatically continue to receive annuities or her portion of band funds, even after losing her status. The Superintendent-General was also given the power to provide transportation for children to a school, apply the annuities of a child to the upkeep of a school, and enforce compulsory attendance of children aged 7-15 at schools.

Implications
The Superintendent General was given increased control over band membership and the status of Aboriginal women, which had previously been the domain of Aboriginal male leadership in band councils. By putting this power in the hands of the Superintendent General, it provided the opportunity for abuse of power, in that the SG could reward or punish Aboriginal women who either conformed or resisted the imposition of Christianity and European gender roles. As such, the SG could prohibit her from living on the reserve or receiving annuities that may have been necessary for survival. These amendments represent a trend in amendments to the Indian Act in which bureaucratic surveillance and control of Indigenous affairs increased over time. No accountability structures or system of checks and balances were simultaneously applied to compensate for the powers afforded these expansions of bureaucratic oversight. This is indicative of the belief that it was Indigenous people who posed a threat to societal order, and from whom society needed to be protected, obscuring the potential for abuses of the state’s power and vulnerability to harm from Indian Agents and other colonial officials. There do not appear to have been discussions of rights of Aboriginal peoples or potential routes of advocacy in cases of corruption, such as unjust accusations of criminality.
Sources

PAC, RG10, Vol. 6810, file 470-2-3, vol. 6: Amendment Bill Brief Scott sent to Lougheed 18 May 1814, p. 2-3 including regulations relating to the education of Indian children, Order-in-Council of August 6, 1908; Vol. 7: House of Commons -- Bill -- Act to amend the Indian Act (1920), proposed addition of a sixth subsection to sec. 10; Vol. 8: R.C.M.P Inspector T. Dann, Manitoba District to the R.C.M.P Commissioner, Ottawa, 9 December 1926; R.C.M.P Commissioner Cortlandt Starnes to the Deputy Supt.-Gen., 15 December 1926; Memo of A.S Williams, D.I.A Law Clerk, 14 January 1927.

Sub Event
Superintendent General Given Control over Non-Status Women Living On-Reserve, School Attendance
Date
1920-00-00
Documents
File
File Description
An Act to Amend the Indian Act: 10-11 George V, Chapt. 50,

Indian Act Amendment

Summary

An 1890 amendment to section 16 of the Indian Act legislated that "no Indian could be granted more than 160 acres of land." This created barriers to the agricultural and economic development of reserve farmers, as they were unable to expand their farms to produce commercially. This amendment also added sexual offences to the jurisdiction of the Indian Agent. Jurisdiction over this offecse was removed in 1892, but restored in 1894 along with prostitution and vagrancy. The addition of sexual offences increased the jurisdiction of the Indian Agent gave the agent further control over the lives of Aboriginal peoples, especially women, and is reflective of paternalistic perceptions of Aboriginal women as sexually deviant. Departmental officials, missionaries, and teachers were strictly forbidden from trading with Aboriginal peoples.

Implications
To note, Indigenous women's identities have by and large been hypersexualized, portraying them as promiscuous, immoral, and over-sexual (thus constituting a threat to a white Euro-Canadian population). Because of this, Indigenous women have been unduly targeted both officially and unofficially by laws and behaviour. This has lead to the rampant abuse of Indigenous women since contact and still permeates contemporary Canadian society, perpetuated by the public, police and corrections, lawmakers, and the government.
Sources

Venne, Sharon Helen. Indian Acts and Amendments, 1868-1975: An Indexed Collection. Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan Native Law Centre, 1981. 110.

Sub Event
Addition of Land Allotment Restrictions, Sexual Offences, Prohibition on Trading
Date
1890-00-00

Indian Affairs Circular Prohibits Polygamy

Summary

Superintendent J.F Graham wrote a circular distributed to Indian Agents advising them not to recognize polygamous marriages by prohibiting husbands from collecting annuities for more than one wife. This circular also states that the practice of adoption between bands and the transfer of band status is "very objectionable" and should be discontinued, except in exceptional cases as decided by the Superintendent General. It further states that any chiefs whose band members are found to be misrepresenting themselves to receive greater annuity payments (ex. by presenting themselves for payment with more than one band) were liable to be removed from their position as chief. Most Indian Agents were under the assumption that an anti-polygamy law was in place until 1890 – they had assumed it was illegal because the Indian Affairs Department had instructed them not to recognize such couplings. Following this ordinance, men who were in polygamous marriages would have to choose one wife in order to receive annuities, rendering many women "semi-widows".

Implications
This policy encouraged moral surveillance and discipline, forced conformity to Victorian Christian moral norms in an effort to further government's goals of assimilation and elimination of the "Indian Problem." Marriages were invalidated by these policies because they did not fit into the western ideal of a nuclear, Euro-Christian family unit. The prohibition of polygamous marriages would also often leave one or more wives who had been "discarded" without her former support network, alone (sometimes with children), and forced to adjust to a lifestyle (Euro-Canadian) implicated by colonial powers. This assertion of power disproportionately effected older women who were wives, primary source documentation showing that a younger wife was often chosen over an older wife who was less likely to have a wider support network at that point in her life.
Sources

Circular letter of J.F Graham, 24 July 1882, Records of the Department of Indian Affairs, RG 10, vol. 3602, file 1760, LAC.

Date
1882-07-24

Indian Act Amendment

Summary

Section 80 of the 1880 Indian Act forbade First Nations from trading or bartering the presents that they were granted as part of treaties. This 1880 amendment also called for a repealing of section 20 of the Indian Act, which was then replaced with a new section regarding the devising of property by will upon the death. The amended section stated in 20.2 that in order for a widow to receive up to one third of her husband's land, she must be of good moral character, living with her husband at the time of death. The amended section also stated in 20.7 the Superintendent General of the Department of Indian Affairs "shall have power to decide all questions which may arise respecting the distribution, among those entitled, of the land and goods and chattels of a deceased Indian, and also to do whatever he may, under the circumstances, think will best give each claimant his or her share, according to the true meaning and spirit of the Act."

Implications
An integral way of earning money or supplies necessary for First Nations was selling or trading goods they were granted through treaty payments, and this amendment cut off a source of needed revenue for Indigenous peoples.--------------------The amending of section 20 gave an inordinate amount of power and control to the Indian Agents and the Department in arbitrarily deciding what constituted "good" and "moral" behaviour, and demonstrates an inappropriate level of interest in the marital and sexual habits of women on the reserve. Racial narratives in Canada portrayed Indigenous women as particularly likely to be promiscuous and immoral, and often placed blame on them for the existence of marital problems such as a partner's infidelity. The surveillance of Indian Agents often resulted in the trapping of Indigenous women in violent, unhealthy, or otherwise undesirable unions. Please see related entry on the "Racist and Gendered Perceptions of Indigenous Women."
Sources

Andrews, Isabel. “The Crooked Lakes Reserves: A Study of Indian Policy in Practice from the Qu’Appelle Treaty to 1900.” Thesis, 1972.

Sub Event
Prohibition of Trading/Bartering Treaty Gifts; Gender-Biased Legislation of Victorian Judeo-Christian Moral Principles
Date
1880-00-00

First Nation Women's Suffrage

Summary

According to the Indian Act, First Nations women could neither vote nor be elected to band counsels until the Act was amended in 1951. The vote for First Nations women came roughly 33 years after suffrage was granted to white settler women within Canada in all provinces exempting Quebec (1940).


 

Result

First Nations women were removed from the political sphere within their own communities, and were stripped of the political and leadership status they held within their communities prior to the introduction of this laws. As such, the Canadian Government continued their colonial occupation by systemically removing First Nation women's political authority, sovereignty, and decision-making power.  


 

Fill

 

Date
1876-00-00
Region

Racist and Gendered Perceptions of Indigenous Women

Summary

Beginning in the late 1800s, Euro-Canadian government officials found various reasons to victim-blame Indigenous women for widely felt poverty and distress. Officials claimed that they were dirty, gossipy, had no understanding of money and the economy, and most of all were immoral. This is exemplified in an 1886 controversy that arose from a newspaper article published by missionary Samuel Trivett, in which he wrote about the promiscuity of Indigenous women and the frequency of their inappropriate relations with NWMP officers, without consideration if . Canadian officials responded by denying inappropriate behaviour on the part of the NWMP. Although, they conceded that if there were incidents of such behaviour, the blame rested with Aboriginal women, who were inherently sexually promiscuous and seductive, thereby taking advantage of male police officers. Please see related database entry titled "History of Racist and Gendered Perceptions of Indigenous Women."

Implications
This is evident of long-standing popular misconceptions about Indigenous women and their morals regarding sex and sexuality. These misconceptions were commonly perpetuated in news, literary and visual media, uniformly portraying Indigenous women as highly sexual individuals. These perceptions were widely accepted by and influenced the actions of government and settler society at large. As it relates to power imbalances between Indigenous women and colonial officials, political actors failed to recognize the disadvantaged position of Indigenous women, who the state considered morally inferior by virtue of their race and gender, and the enormous power of NWMP officers who possessed a greater perceived credibility as well as the moral authority as 'officers of the law.' NWMP officers also possessed the ability to engage in abuses of power in an unaccountable manner and the government failed to protect Indigenous women as a vulnerable population from these abuses.
Sources

The Facts Respecting Indian Administration in the North-West, (Ottawa: 1886), quoted pp. 9, 12. William Donovan to L. Vankoughnet, 31 October 1886, NA, RG 10, vol. 3772, file 34983.

Date
1870-00-00