Provincial Governance

Northern and Southern Metis Political Organizations Merge into Métis Society of Saskatchewan

Summary

In the 1930s the diverse needs of Metis individuals in various areas of the province, coupled with distinct leadership visions and significant geographic distance, resulted in two Metis organizations that represented the Northern and Southern regions of the province, with the dividing line being Saskatoon. In 1967, both groups merged into the pre-existing Métis Society of Saskatchewan, which thenceforth represented both northern and southern regions of the province.

Implications
Hypothetically, this unification would provide more cohesion for the Metis of Saskatchewan, and potentially, greater political clout.
Date
1967-00-00

Formation of the Metis Society of Saskatchewan

Summary

Following the earlier establishment of the Metis association of Alberta, Joe Ross, Joseph Larocque, and other leaders who were based in Regina laid the foundation for the establishment of the Metis Society of Saskatchewan (also known as the Saskatchewan Metis Society), an organization hoping to form an official advocacy/government lobbying group through which they could address socioeconomic marginalization. Led by Joe Ross the organization established new locals outside Regina.

Implications
The Metis Society of Saskatchewan at times had difficulty growing their membership. Primary sources confirm that experiences of terrorization, racial discrimination and extreme poverty following the 1870 and 1885 resistances had left Metis people with a deeply entrenched fear of government opposition. Please see related entry on the 1870 "Reign of Terror."
Date
1937-00-00

Provincial Voting Rights Granted to Aboriginal People

Summary

A resolution was passed in the provincial legislature to universally grant the right to vote to Aboriginal people, despite the fact that Aboriginal leaders had not granted their approval.

Implications
Premier Douglas recognized that he had broken his promise not to grant the vote without the agreement of Aboriginal people, but sided with the legislative majority instead.
Date
1960-03-11
Documents
File
File Description
Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan Debates. 4th session. 13 legislature. 11 March, 1960

Provincial Conferences of Saskatchewan Indian Chiefs and Councillors at Fort Qu'Appelle

Summary

One hundred and three councillors and Chiefs attended a conference of Indigenous leaders in Fort Qu'Appelle on October 30, 1958, during which Premier T.C. Douglas presented proposals on liquor and voting rights. In an effort to implement an integrationist policy, Douglas sought to pass legislation extending provincial voting rights to First Nations, removing restrictions on the sale of liquor on reserves, and the transfer of responsibility from Indian Affairs to the provincial government. The issue of provincial franchise was controversial since the term resembled "enfranchisement", the term used in the Indian Act to describe a colonial process by which an someone lost their ‘Indian Status,’ gained the vote, and were forced to leave their reserve. Since enfranchisement meant the loss of material goods and a ‘legal identity,’ many First Nations peoples were hesitant to accept the vote. Others felt that allowing liquor on reserves was not in the best interest of their populations.

Following deliberations, those present advised Douglas to wait until further consultations with band members had completed so as to avoid conflict. This conference also saw the creation of the Federation of Saskatchewan Indians (FSI), a unified organization for Indigenous peoples across the province. As the government's policies faced rejection Douglas’ government aimed to adopt a more consultative style, and created an Advisory Committee composed of one Indigenous member from each of the nine agencies in the province. The committee was set up to help plan the next conference and consult with members on reserves. A second conference took place at Fort Qu'Appelle on October 20 and 21, 1959. As with the first conference, no consensus was obtained regarding voting and liquor rights.

Implications
A motion was eventually passed that granted franchise to First Nations in the province, although it was passed without their consent and contrary to what Douglas had promised. Douglas gave three reasons for the action: voting would not jeopardize treaty rights, politicians were more apt to listen to Indigenous peoples if they were voters, and, according to Douglas, many young people said they wanted the vote. However, throughout Douglas’ premiership were frequent objections from Indigenous leaders, such as John Tootoosis and Andrew Paull), who expressed their anger and frustration with the CCF and “white men’s” interference on Indian affairs and policy. This was due to the fact that CCF officials frequently called meetings of the FSI, pressed the Federal government for policy change on behalf of the FSI, and pressured FSI leadership to adopt colonial policies and ‘lifestyles’ in place of Indigenous self-governance and control of resources.
Sources

Barron, F.L., Walking in Indian Moccasins: the native policies of Tommy Douglas and the CCF, 80-82.

 

Pitsula, James. "The Saskatchewan CCF Government and Treaty Indians, 1944-1964." Canadian Historical Review 75, no. 1 (1994): 33-34.

 

Saskatchewan Archives Board, Douglas Papers, R-33.1 XLV 864d (49) 4/6 "Indians" Cabinet Memorandum, November 7, 1958.

Date
1958-10-30

Private Member's Resolutions Call for Upgraded Services to Aboriginal People

Summary

CCF MLA Berezowsky introduced two private member's resolutions, in 1954 and 1956 respectively, which called for upgraded services for First Nations people to a level comparable to those of non-Indigenous citizens. In addition, the resolutions demanded that First Nations treaty members in Canada be granted full citizenship rights without abrogating any privileges and rights provided by treaties. Both resolutions passed unanimously.

Implications
The passing of these resolutions in the provincial legislature created the need for provincial-federal discussions over responsibility for First Nations services, as they were still under the jurisdiction of the federal government. The issue of citizenship rights led to tension among various provincial First Nations organizations, as many viewed enfranchisement as a final step toward assimilation of First Nations people into mainstream Canadian settler society.
Date
1954-00-00
Documents
File
File Description
Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan Debates. 2nd session. 12th legislature. 2 March, 1954
File
File Description
Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan Debates. 4th session. 12th legislature. 23 February, 1956

Natural Resources Transfer Agreements

Summary

Agreements were negotiated between the federal and provincial governments transferring control over land and natural resources to the provinces; prior jurisdiction had previously been held by the federal government. Reserve and Crown lands were not included in the transfer. However, some of the lands used by Indigenous peoples to hunt/trap/fish now fell under provincial jurisdiction and were subjected to conservation regulations.


 

Result

 

The application of game laws to Indigenous peoples has posed issues since the transfer, as they have the right to hunt/fish/trap on all reserve and Crown lands. However, the provincial government continues to subject Indigenous peoples to game laws that infringe on hunting, trapping, and fishing rights outlined in federal negotiations. In the western provinces, another issue is that insufficient lands were set aside through treaties for hunting and trapping which makes hunting on designated lands more difficult as game continually moves. Primary source documents reveal that several Indigenous hunters were fined or prosecuted for killing moose or other big game following the new transfer agreements. Often, the hunters were unaware of regulations, or were hunting as an act of resistance, believing that they retained the right to hunt in large quantities on certain tracts of land. The transfer caused widespread confusion and there was a lack of consultation with Indigenous peoples in the province; exclusion meant that new terms were not communicated effectively, and that their specific needs/rights regarding game and access to land were not considered. Overall, this represents a failure on behalf of both the federal and provincial governments that effected food security and accessibility. Additionally, records suggest that Indigenous hunters who were fined and criminalized for breaking regulations were treated more harshly than white hunters for similar discrepancies. 


 

Sources

 

Taylor, John Leonard. Canadian Indian Policy during the Inter-war Years, 1918-1939. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, 1984. 103-104.

 

Government of Canada. Statutes of Canada. Memorandum of Agreement, Saskatchewan Natural Resources: 20-21 George V, 16th Parliament, 4th Session, Chapt. 41. 322-326. - Transfer of public lands from the Federal government to the Province. All rights of fishery shall be administered by the Province. All lands included in reserves will continue to be administered by the Crown. In order to secure of the Indians of the province a continued supply of game and fish, Canada agrees that the provincial laws apply from time to time to the Indians, but that the Indians should have the right to trap, fish and hunt for food at all seasons of the year on all unoccupied Crown lands.

 

RG10, C- 8093, Vol. 6731, File 420-1; Title: MacInnes to Colonel Starnes, 21 March, 1931.

Regarding the enforcement of the Provincial Game Laws in the Provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta. As noted from the Crime Reports, a number of Indians have been prosecuted for killing moose, deer and other game animals. In this connection may I draw your attention to the clause on this subject which was contained in each of the Capital Agreements for the Natural Resources as follows: "In order to secure to the Indians of the province the continuance of the supply of game and fish for their support and subsistence, Canada agrees that the laws respecting game in force in the province from time to time shall apply to the Indians within the boundaries thereof, provided, however, that the said Indians shall have the right, which the province hereby assures to them, of hunting, trapping and fishing game and fish for food at all seasons of the year on all unoccupied Crown lands and on any lands to which the said Indians may have a right to access."


 

Fill

 

Date
1930-00-00
Documents
File
File Description
Memorandum of Agreement, Saskatchewan Natural Resources: 20-21 George V, 16th Parliament, 4th Sessio

Government Avoids Jurisdictional Responsibility for Métis

Summary

The Constitution Act of 1867 outlined that "the Indians, and Lands reserved for the Indians” would be under the legislative authority of the Parliament of Canada. This act did not take into account the presence of Métis people and their access to land and traditional territories.

Implications
This ambiguity has resulted in the Métis population in Canada being in “political and legal limbo.” As neither federal or provincial governments have taken responsibility to determine Métis—such as hunting, fishing, trapping, and land rights.
Sub Event
Métis Status in Canada defined by 1867 Constitution Act Section 91(24)
Date
1867-00-00
Documents
File

Metis St. Laurent Council

Summary

Metis peoples emigrating from Manitoba to the South Saskatchewan River Valley wanted to assert their political authority. The St. Laurent Council’s first assembly was held on 10 December 1872, Gabriel Dumont was elected president. Between 1873 and 1875 twenty eight laws were updated to allow the St. Laurent Council to regulate and oversee various aspects of life in the North West Territories, including the hunt. As deterrents to follow these rules the council would often levy fines. In the spring of 1875 a conflict developed after HBC employee Peter Ballantine violated the rules of the St. Laurent constitution and left for the annual hunt in advance of the main party. With the assent of the general assembly, Gabriel Dumont levied a fine on the offenders. Ballantine complained to HBC officer Lawrence Clark, who asked the local NWMP to intervene. An expedition of fifty NWMP led by Colonel French was sent to pressure the Metis to give up local power. Dumont and the council did so.

Implications
This conflict led to a complete dissolution of the St. Laurent Council’s power over key economic activities, as Colonel French’s expedition undermined the power and authority of the Metis council. The Metis loss of power was compounded by the fact the Metis on the South Saskatchewan River had no delegates or representation in the Territorial Government in the 1870s. It was not until 1881 when the electoral district of Lorne was created and that the Metis in Duck Lake, St. Laurent and Batoche had the ability to elect an official to the Territorial Government. Furthermore, the dissolution of the St. Laurent Council ended the Metis regulation of the bison hunt. This situation quickened the decline of the bison population forcing Metis peoples to alter their way of life.
Sources

PAA, Oblate Collection, St. Laurent-de-Grandin Parish Records, item 5 (St. Laurent Chronicles, 1875). PAC, RG 18Al, vol.1, no. 333, Colonel French to the Federal Minister of Justice, 17 August 1875.

Sub Event
Assertion of rights of self-government are met with government oppression
Date
1875-00-00

Red River Resistance, Manitoba Act of 1870 and Reign of Terror

Summary

The Manitoba Act was passed at the closing of the Red River Resistance in 1870, which provided for the province of Manitoba and allowed the Red River settlement to enter Confederation as Canada's fifth province. Prime Minister J.A. MacDonald stated that he would compensate the Metis in the new province in order to settle the west peacefully, although the provincial land would be owned publicly. There were also provisions in the Act which protected the French language and Roman Catholic religion. Section 31 of the Act provided land for the children of Metis heads of families, which amounted to 1.4 million acres, to be divided into tracts and allotted to Métis families by Lieutenant-Governor Adam Archibald. Section 32 guaranteed all previous settlers possession of the lots they occupied before 15 July 1870, as well as hay rights in the outer two miles of various river lots. An amendment to section 32 in 1874 provided $160 scrip redeemable by Métis heads of families. The 1874 amendment also stated that improvements needed to be made to the land in order to obtain the title. Following the creation of the Manitoba Act, Prime Minister MacDonald refused to distribute the land legally owed to Metis people. The plan of Lieutenant Governor Archibald was to allow the Metis to maintain the river lot system of farming and distribute the 1.4 million acres over a period of approximately one year. Distribution of land in fulfillment of section 31 took over a decade, however, causing many frustrated Metis people to migrate west into Alberta and Saskatchewan, as well as the United States. As well, government officials changed their minds about the 1.4 million acres, stating that the claimed land was now required to be outside the province of Manitoba. They also changed the date of proof of occupation to a date when most Metis would be away from their farms hunting buffalo. Shortly after the Act was passed, MacDonald sent 1200 troops to Fort Garry (now known as Winnipeg), to surveil and control the new province. The troops, as well as the influx of settlers, terrorized the Metis residents. Many Metis individuals were murdered, beaten, and raped. Metis landholders were frequently harassed in non-physical ways as well.


 

Result

The above summary of events demonstrates that there were several federal tactics employed to make it exceedingly difficult for the Metis to obtain their land title after scrip had been issued.  Prime Minister MacDonald actively vetoed the plans of Lieutenant Governor Archibald, in the hopes that delaying the distribution of land to the Metis would allow white settlers to outnumber the Metis, forcing them to leave.  These federal delay tactics were effective, as many Metis migrated, although they continued to petition the government in Ottawa to settle their outstanding claims.  As well, the Metis were still involved in the buffalo economy.  The government was aware that many Metis families left their farms for extended periods of time while on the hunt, during which they allowed non-Aboriginal settlers to occupy and steal Metis farm lots .  As a result of these federal tactics, approximately 65 percent of Metis people lost their land to non-Aboriginal homesteaders in Manitoba.

The efforts of MacDonald to send a large number of troops into the newly formed province demonstrate a retaliatory effort to keep the region under tight state control.  The permissive attitude of the government towards methods of psychological and physical intimidation including murder, physical beatings and rape of an already oppressed people would have served to severely fracture the sense of community safety and family cohesion.  The psychological trauma caused by rape in particular is known to have long-term and even intergenerational consequences for emotional and mental health if appropriate or sufficient social supports are not available.  These tactics of physical and psychological violence were used to keep the Metis in a position of political subordination.  The researcher notes that in the era of the modern state, criteria provided by the United Nations in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court would classify the actions of the government as war crimes (extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly) and crimes against humanity (murder, rape, persecution based on ethnicity). 


 

Sources
  • An Act to amend and continue the Act 32 and 33 Victoria, chapter 3 ; and to establish and provide for the Government of the Province of Manitoba, S.C. 1870, c. 3

 

Fill

 

Date
1870-05-12
Documents
File

Community Development Submission to Cabinet

Summary

In the 1960s, disparities between Indigenous welfare expenditures and settler welfare expenditures were significant, with spending on the former outweighing the latter. As a result, the government saw a need to counter the growing welfare expenditures. Walter Rudnicki pitched a community development program to cabinet which called on provinces to partially assume the expenses of health and welfare transfer payments. This proposal also vaguely focused on increased self-sufficiency for Indigenous peoples, although no concrete steps were outlined. Cabinet approved the program on May 28, 1964.

Implications
This program was, in effect, a large-scale integration (and assimilation) policy, as confirmed by Rudnicki had confirmed himself. It was believed that removing the fiduciary obligation of Indigenous welfare from the federal government and distributing it to provincial and band governments would remove the status of Indigenous peoples (at this time, status only applied to First Nations as Inuit and Métis). The Government argued that status supposedly prevented them from being economically responsible, permitting 'dependence on federal welfare.' Removing the status of Indigenous peoples at this time threatened the protections and Treaty rights that had been agreed upon by signatories nearly a century prior. This would allow the government to legally steam-roll Indigenous peoples with a new access to Indigenous lands and resources as title to them would be extinguished with the removal of 'status.'
Sources

NAC, RG-10, CR Series, Vol. 8194, File 1/29-6, Part 3, Memorandum to Cabinet, 'Community Development, Indian Affairs Branch,' February 1964, with covering memorandum to the Deputy Minister, C.M Isbister from R.F Battle, Director, Indian Affairs Branch, Ottawa, n.d, items 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9

Sub Event
Community Development Submission to Cabinet
Date
1964-02-00