Treaties

Treaty 6 Adhesion

Summary

Not present at the initial treaty negotiations, Chief Moosomin signed on to Treaty 6 on behalf of his community agreeing to the treaty terms set out in 1876. The written version of Treaty 6 provided signatories with reserves for farming, annual annuities, annual chief salaries, farming implements, education, hunting, fishing and trapping rights, and aid (most notably in times of famine or epidemic).

Implications
Following creation of the treaties, the Canadian Government avoided implementing aspects of the written treaty document to curb their spending. Thus, disagreement surrounded the implementation of Treaty 6. Many First Nations signatories reported that the government was not preventing famine, preserving their livelihoods or their sovereignty.----- Specifically relevant, the Moosomin First Nation were removed from their original reserve in 1909 and relocated to Chochin because Euro-Canadians desired to settle near the Canadian Northern Railway that was constructed through their reserve in 1903. It wasn't until 1986 that the Moosomin First Nation placed a claim addressing the poor living conditions that resulted from the relocation. In 2003, the negotiations proved successful and the Reserve was expanded, and a monetary settlement was used to improve on social programs and invest on the Reserve. The relocation of the Moosomin First Nation represents a prioritization of western settlement despite the Government's obligation to uphold Treaty rights for the Moosomin First Nation.
Sub Event
Moosomin First Nation
Date
1881-00-00
Community
Theme(s)

Treaty 6 Adhesion: Lac La Ronge and Montreal Lake

Summary

In response to low fur prices and poor hunting and fishing conditions the Wood Cree of Lac La Ronge and Montreal Lake sought to gain the economic benefits of Treaty 6. These groups agreed to the same terms of Treaty 6 signed earlier, which provided signatories with reserves for farming, annual annuities, annual chief salaries, farming implements, education, hunting, fishing and trapping rights, and aid (most notably in times of famine or epidemic). However, they requested that agricultural items be exchanged for goods they expected to be more useful in the forested environment, such as ammunition. This adhesion added over 10,000 square miles of land to the Treaty 6 area providing the Canadian government with the ability to freely expand logging into the region.


 

Result

In Bounty and Benevolence a History of Saskatchewan Treaties, authors Arthur Ray, J.R. Miller, and Frank Tough write on this adhesion of treaty 6: "From the official written records of the talks, the issues raised included the request for a payment of arrears going back to the date of the original treaty in 1876 reserves and surveys, schools, the substitution of some agricultural items for more ammunition and twine, and a request for a farm instructor. With respect to back payment, Irvine explained that he was authorized to pay only twelve dollars to each person. After the adjournment, the provision for agricultural assistance in Treaty 6 was discussed, and fewer cattle, some pigs, and fewer ploughs and fewer scythes were suggested. Similarly, the horses, harnesses, and wagons were not seen as useful by the Wood Cree. McNeill noted "The value for the articles that they wont [sic]receive under Treaty stipulations in ammunition and twine for nets." The chiefs also expected seed potatoes and requested medicines. Councillor Bird asked that "the old and helpless people may get some clothing." McNeill's notes also recorded that "Col. Irvine said that he would recommend to the Government that they should be supplied with the things they have asked for."


The adhesion of 1889 is unique because it added territory to the original territory described as Treaty 6 and because it was conducted during the winter trapping season. The adhesion concerned not only Indian title in the territory described by the adhesion document but also "transfer, surrender and relinquish" of any other lands: "Also all our right, title and interest whatsoever to all other lands wherever situated, whether within the limits of any other Treaty heretofore made or hereafter to be made with Indians, and whether the said lands are situated in the North-West Territories or elsewhere in Her Majesty's Dominions, to have and to hold the same unto and for the use of Her Majesty the Queen, Her heirs and successors forever."[71] The Crown's statement of a broad interest in unspecified lands outside a particular geographic territory of a treaty or a territorial adhesion is known as a "blanket extinguishment clause." (pp. 144-145).


 

Sources
  • Ray, Arthur J., Ray, Arthur J., Bounty and Benevolence a History of Saskatchewan Treaties. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2000. pp. 144-145. 
Fill

 

Date
1889-02-11
Theme(s)

Treaty 6 Adhesion

Summary

In the presence of Edgar Dewdney Indian Commissioner in the North-west Territories, Lucky Man and Little Pine agreed to the terms of Treaty 6. The written Treaty 6 document provided signatories with reserves for farming, annual annuities, annual chief salaries, farming implements, education, hunting, fishing and trapping rights, and aid (most notably in times of famine or epidemic), in exchange for a cession of community land rights.

Implications
For more information on the government's treaty failures, please see other database entries on Treaty 6, as well as the recommended pages from St. Germain's book, Broken Treaties: United States and Canadian Relations with the Lakotas and the Plains Cree, 1868-1885.
Sources

St. Germain, Jill. Broken Treaties: United States and Canadian Relations with the Lakotas and the Plains Cree, 1868-1885. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2009. 177-250.

Sub Event
Fort Walsh
Date
1878-07-02
Theme(s)

Treaty 6 Adhesion

Summary

The Mosquito nation agreed to the terms of Treaty 6 at Battleford. Treaty 6 provided signatories with reserves, annuities, farming implements, education, hunting, fishing and trapping rights, and aid (most notably in times of famine or epidemic).

Implications
Mosquito and Grizzly Bear’s Head bands merged in 1951. The sole remaining member of the Lean Man band joined Grizzly Bear’s Head in 1931. This is the only band in Canada to hold both Treaty 4 and 6 status.
Sources

St. Germain, Jill. Broken Treaties: United States and Canadian Relations with the Lakotas and the Plains Cree, 1868-1885. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2009. 177-250.

Sub Event
Battleford
Date
1878-08-29
Theme(s)

Treaty 6: Background

Summary

In response to the depletion of bison and recurring epidemics Indigenous peoples on the Plains north of the Treaty 4 boundaries entered into a new treaty with the Dominion of Canada. They hoped to ensure future community prosperity. Alexander Morris was the treaty commissioner. In comparison to other treaties, the Treaty 6 negotiations focused more specifically on medical assistance and famine relief. On 23 August multiple Indigenous leaders agreed to the terms of Treaty 6, which provided signatories with reserves for farming, annual annuities, annual chief salaries, farming implements, education, hunting, fishing and trapping rights, and aid (most notably in times of famine or epidemic), in exchange for sharing 120,000 acres of land in western Canada. Additional signings occurred on 28 August.

Implications
Treaty 6 negotiations resulted in the creation of two new concessions: aid in times of pestilence and famine and medical assistance. Disagreement surrounded the implementation of Treaty 6. As they did not speak or write English fluently, First Nations leaders relied on interpreters and oral agreements during the negotiations. Some of these agreements were not included in the written documents. As well, the Canadian Government avoided implementing aspects of the written treaty document to curb their spending.
Sources

Morris, Alexander. The Treaties of Canada with the Indians of Manitoba and the North-West Territories Including the Negotiations on which they were based, and other Information relating thereto. Saskatoon: Fifth House, 1991. 168-222. St. Germain, Jill. Broken Treaties: United States and Canadian Relations with the Lakotas and the Plains Cree, 1868-1885. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2009. 177-250.

Sub Event
Fort Carlton
Fill

Background Information

Date
1876-08-18
Theme(s)

Pasqua and Muscowpetung Petition to Government of Canada

Summary

In 1893 various grievances were brought to the attention of the Canadian government in a petition, including: refusing to provide aid to those unable to work; Indian agent disrupting First Nations sales of commodities; being forced to work for meager payment, and the need for rations to be issued.

Implications
This petition, along with other examples (see Bounty and Benevolence 190-192), highlight that First Nations signatories of Treaty 4 understood that their pact with the Crown included a guarantee of government assistance sufficient to enable them to maintain themselves when the arrival of new settlers impacted traditional subsistence methods. Problems surrounded the implementation of Treaty 4, as many First Nations signatories in the subsequent years reported that the government was not preventing famine, preserving their livelihoods or their sovereignty. Also, First Nations leaders did not speak or write English fluently, and thus relied on interpreters and the integrity of oral agreements during the negotiations. Some of these agreements were not included in the written documents. As well, there is a demonstrated pattern in the implementation of Treaties 4, 6 and 8 of the Canadian government avoiding execution of aspects of written treaty documents to curb their spending. For an example, please see "Provisioning of rations described as humanitarian rather than legal obligation (Treaty 6)".
Sources

NA, MG29 E106, Reed Papers, vol. 20, file March 1893, W.M. McGirr to Hayter Reed, 8 March 1893, enclosing typed copy of petition (To the Honourable the House of Commons, Ottawa) of 24 February 1893 from four Pasqua headmen (Charles Asham, Kahkakeesick, Howinacasa, and Johnny Asham) and three form Muscowpetung (Muscocaffa, A. Pisteenow, adn Keesick).

Date
1893-00-00
Theme(s)

Reduction of Department of Indian Affairs Funding

Summary

In 1883 the Department of Indian Affairs decided to reduce funding for Indian Affairs as part of an overall reduction in government spending. Furthermore, a large portion of the reduced DIA funding was used to experiment with the creation of residential schools.

Implications
Indigenous groups already facing lack of game, harsh winters, poor crop yields, and disease in the 1870s and 1880s, now had to cope with reduced federal funding to support their transition to agriculture and new forms of subsistence. Lack of funding made it harder to gain government assistance, despite the fact that the crown had a fiduciary obligation to assist Indigenous peoples. Funding and aid however, was at times limited or withheld because the government saw it either as unnecessary or limiting the assimilation of Indigenous peoples. Lack of funding has and continues to be a pervasive issue between the government and Indigenous relations.
Date
1883-00-00

Appealing to Lord Lorne to amend the terms of Treaty 4

Summary

Aboriginal signatories of Treaty 4 took the opportunity presented by the visit of Governor General Lorne to Western Canada to outline their grievances with treaty implementation. They continued to assert their right under the treaty to have their livelihoods ensured. Lorne was asked if the treaty terms could be improved in order to ensure that this could happen.

Implications
Lorne's response dismissed these requests saying he would not amend the treaty. Several speakers continued to reiterate that treaty reformation was necessary because the signatory communities were not being provided with the means to live. It should be noted that Indigenous people who engaged in treaty viewed it as a living relationship that was ongoing and required maintenance or revisiting in order to be beneficial to both parties. It should be noted that it was common throughout the numbered treaty negotiations for oral promises to be made that were not included in the written document, which was considered the "official" document by Canadian officials. A rewording of the Treaty was necessary to ensure that continued European settlement did not threaten the livelihood and prosperity of First Nations signatories.
Sources

NA, RG10, vol. 3768, file 33642.

Date
1881-00-00
Community

Kawkeeshiway Grievance Regarding Treaty 4 Implemenation

Summary

At Fort Qu'Appelle, Kawkeeshiway (Loud Voice) expressed his displeasure that the treaty was not being implemented as they understood the agreement. Specifically, the government was not providing the means for subsistence negotiated in the treaty.

Implications
Louis O'Soup (Speaking on behalf of the signatories) implied that if the proper subsistence was not provided that the treaty should be repudiated. This event highlights the discrepancies between the agreement First Nations peoples believed they were entering and how the treaties were ultimately implemented. As they did not speak or write English fluently, First Nations leaders relied on interpreters and oral agreements during the negotiations. Some of these agreements were not included in the written documents. As well, the Canadian Government avoided implementing aspects of the written treaty document to curb their spending.
Sources

Trow, James. Manitoba and the North West Territories: Letters by James Trow. Ottawa: Department of Agriculture, 1878. 53.

Date
1878-08
Community
Theme(s)

Adoption of Macdonald's National Policy

Summary

Macdonald’s National Policy focused on expanding transport and reach across the country; linking it sea to sea using a transcontinental railroad, encouraging Western settlement (by Europeans, Americans, and Eastern Canadians), and encouraging domestic production with protective tariffs. In order to accomplish this, Indigenous lands in the west were sought for railroad construction and land settlement. For instance, the occupation of these lands was undertaken through treaty and reserve policies. In 1878, Macdonald made himself head of the Department of the Interior, giving himself ultimate control over settlement policy and Indigenous policy in the North-West.


 

Sources

Tobias, John L. “Protection, Civilization, Assimilation: An Outline History of Canada’s Indian Policy.” Western Canadian Journal of Anthropology 6.2 (1976)

Fill

 

Date
1878-00-00
Region