Integration & Mobility

Minnesota Massacre and Arrival of Dakota in Canada

Summary

In 1851, a treaty was signed between the Dakota and the American government that stipulated that they would be provided for during the following fifty years. The Treaties of Traverse des Sioux and Mendota, as they were named, also forced the Dakota to cede all remaining lands in Minnesota and a small part of South Dakota. Historical accounts suggest the american government failed to deliver promised food, goods and payment for land transfer to the Dakota bands in 1862, thus breaching treaty promises. The Minnesota Massacre, also known as the Dakota War of 1862, was an armed conflict between the United States and several bands of Dakota. Following settler encroachment on Dakota lands near the Minnesota river, as well as broken treaty promises, tensions arose and attacks were committed against settler communities, with the american military eventually retaliating against the Dakota bands. The conflict ended with the hanging of 38 Dakota men on December 26, 1862, making it the largest mass execution in american history. Thousands of Dakota fleeing the violence crossed the border into Canada. Oral history accounts suggest that at the time, bounties were potentially being offered for Dakota who were suspected of having participated in the Minnesota Massacre. It is possible americans travelled to Canada and deliberately poisoned Dakota members living there in retaliation for their participation in the Minnesota Massacre. Please see the Robert Goodvoice interview, pages 5-9, for further information.---------------- In 1876, a group of Dakota led by Chiefs Whitecap and Medicine Bear requested that they be granted reserves in British territory, but were refused by government officials on the grounds that they had already signed a treaty with the United States. However, this treaty had been nullified following the Minnesota Massacre. In fact, in 1863 the Lincoln government expelled the Dakota from Minnesota to Nebraska and South Dakota, and their reserves were abolished. Oral history accounts suggest the government of the United States subsequently offered the Dakota who had fled to Canada following the Minnesota Massacre an amnesty. The amnesty was intended to encourage them to return to the United States. They were told that those who returned would receive a quarter section per adult and eighty acres per child. Only one person, Wasoomacanow, returned to the US and received his land. The offer of amnesty for returning Dakota following the Minnesota Massacre was open for ten years.

Implications
The Minnesota Massacre and ensuing Dakota immigration into Canada is significant because the bands demanded to sign treaties with the canadian government, which they were refused. The Canadian government considered the Dakota to be refugees and thus were not included in treaty negotiations. They would be tolerated in Canada as a matter of grace and expediency, since there was no military or police force in the West strong enough to expel them at the time. Citing their alliance with the British crown during the War of 1812, the Dakota maintained (and continue to maintain) the canadian government had the obligation of providing them a treaty and treaty entitlements. Their lack of treaty increased the vulnerability of the band for several reasons. The fact they the band had no treaty signified they could not make land claims, and received no annuity payments or other supports from the canadian government. This translated to less land for reserves, less support for economic development and diminished access to opportunities. Nonetheless, the Dakota were able to adapt to their new situation in Canada, developing solid agricultural economies and occupying jobs at trading posts around Fort Ellis and Fort Qu'Appelle. Other bands and Métis communities in the Red River region were also unhappy with the arrival of the Dakota, as food and commercial resources were diminishing rapidly. The Métis, already threatened with the transfer of their lands to the country of Canada, did not wish to see another claimant to lands and political consideration in the Northwest. The following Saskatchewan bands received reserve land, but were not included in the treaty process: Whitecap Dakota First Nation, Wahpeton Dakota First Nation and Standing Buffalo First Nation.
Sub Event
Dakota denied treaty by canadian government.
Date
1862-00-00

Northern Child Welfare Relocation Policy

Summary

Under the CCF provincial government, it became common practice to remove children from homes in northern communities, which were primarily Indigenous, and place them with southern non-Indigenous families. Non-Indigenous child placements in the southern part of the province were deemed necessary because of a relatively small number of foster homes in the north - a number which was unable to manage the capacity of child welfare activity. The Department of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation recognized the need for staff training and increased capacity for accommodations. The isolated location of many northern communities also caused administrative difficulties.

Implications
For children who were separated from their families and sent to southern, non-native communities, there was often a sense of cultural disconnect and an inability to function meaningfully in either southern non-Indigenous society or northern Indigenous society. However, not all children from within the child welfare system had bad experiences, and some report that they benefited from the aid they received while in foster care. It is important to emphasize that due to the relocation from home communities, Indigenous children were dislocated from their family, their support networks, and their cultures - all of which have had drastically negative effects on the health and psyche of Indigenous peoples, and their children. Please see other database entries on the effects of "60s scoop" policies and actions for further information.
Date
1944-00-00

Subsistence Patterns on the Plains Are Altered by Death, Disease, Famine

Summary

The winter of 1877-1878, also known as the 'Black Winter' was a particularly difficult time frame within a decade of malnourishment, famine, violence, and disease. Drought and prairie fires, combined with the decline of buffalo on the Plains resulted in a large scale food crisis. This food crisis was met with indifference and exploitation by government officials. Rations were used as a way of coercing Indigenous peoples into treaty agreements and to undermine attempts of Indigenous resistance.

Implications
In an attempt to find food many Plains people moved south towards the violently contested American Plains. Some Cree also migrated north, going as far as Peace River were they came into competition with the local Dunneza population. In addition to the food crisis, diseases thrived among the malnourished and closely grouped reserve communities. By December 1879 the Blackfoot in Alberta and Western Saskatchewan exhibited symptoms of tuberculosis. Scarlet fever killed 30 people at Fort Walsh in September of 1880. The following month scarlet fever and measles infected the Siksika, Piikani, and Cree. In 1881 measles spread among the Niitsitapi in the west and smallpox hit Fort Qu'Appelle. There were a few exceptions to the large scale food crisis and disease outbreaks. The Dakota were thought of as American refugees in the nineteenth century and therefore were not bound by the same regulations as other treaty peoples. During this period the Dakota enjoyed a much greater degree of isolation and a healthy food supply unlike those on the reserves. As a result, the Dakota did not experience the malnourishment and diseases that were decimating the reserve populations.
Sub Event
'Black Winter'
Date
1877-00-00

Lakota and Dakota Arrive on the Canadian Plains

Summary

Minnesota was granted statehood in 1858 resulting in a population explosion, railway development, and an 'Indian War.' Inter-ethnic tensions erupted into violence, particularly between the Lakota and Dakota nations, and the European settlers resulting in the deaths of 500 settlers.

Implications
The violence that occurred on the American Plains impacted the Canadian Plains as well. In 1862, 450 Lakota and Dakota refugees arrived at Red River and in 1863 the presence of 2,000 Dakota, who had a reputation for violence, was causing panic in the colony. Red River struggled to handle the influx of refugees and the unregulated flow of alcohol to the colony couldn't be contained by Red River officials. By 1862 the bison herds had disappeared from the region forcing hunters to go further into contested territory for food and resources.
Sub Event
Minnesota Granted Statehood
Date
1858-00-00

One Arrow Band Requests that their Children be sent to Duck Lake/St. Michael's Boarding School

Summary

In 1895, the One Arrow Band requested that their children be sent to the Duck Lake/St. Michael's Boarding School. Previously, the One Arrow Band refused to send their children to any boarding schools. However, they had been warned by the local Indian Agent that if they didn't send their children to any school they would be taken by force and sent wherever the Department wished.

Implications
The One Arrow Band was coerced/forced into letting their children attend Residential School. Despite protests from parents, their wishes were ignored. It is important to note that treaties stipulated access to education for Indigenous children, but under the control and advisory of Indigenous governments. This incident (common across Canada) shows that the Government did not honour treaty, and they assumed that religious, Eurocentric education was more beneficial to Indigenous children (which has been proven highly incorrect).
Date
1895-00-00

Student Attempts to Runaway from Gordon Indian Residence

Summary

During her time at Gordon Indian Residence from 1959-1964, Geraldine Sanderson recalls that "every once in a while students would run away." Geraldine recalls that travelling from James Smith Reserve to the Gordon Residence required over three hours by bus. Because of the distance, runaways students rarely made it home before being apprehended and punished. Punishment varied according to gender. For example, she recalls one boy being forced to remove his pants in front of students, after which he received 10-15 lashes from the principal with a leather strap. Girls often had their heads shaved.

Implications
These incidents at Gordon Indian Residence reflect a larger pattern of abuse and student runaways, and the reasons behind escape represented a prevalent problem throughout the residential school system. Harsh, often physical punishment for runaways was common and undoubtedly led to a further desire to leave Residential Schools. For more information see; 'Runaways and Student Truancy in the Residential School System.'
Fill

Student Attempts to Runaway from Gordon Indian Residence

Date
1959-00-00

Great Depression

Summary

During the Great Depression many Metis peoples from the Southern Branch began to move into Prince Albert, live for a year and then apply for relief.

Implications
This was a survival strategy enacted as a result of destitution - many Metis people had lived in poverty since the end of the nineteenth century. Please see the related entry on Metis experiences of living on road allowances and scrip distribution. Many Euro-Canadians internalized and projected racist assumptions about a lack of work ethic amongst Indigenous people, including the Metis. They resented the provisioning of Metis people with relief. In particular, Charlotte Whitton, a prominent Canadian citizen and social conservative, blamed the Metis for their condition of poverty. She argued against humanitarian efforts and for the segregational placement of Metis people on reserves.
Sources

"C.W. Report re Unemployment and Relief in Western Canada,1932". 29-30.National Archives of Canada, Charlotte Whitton Papers, vol. 25, Manuscript Division.

Sub Event
Metis Migrations to Prince Albert from the Southern Branch
Date
1930-00-00

English Protestant Migration into Manitoba

Summary

Following the Red River Resistance and the Manitoba Act’s passing a wave of new settlers from Eastern Canada arrived in Manitoba. These individuals were largely English Protestant and were linguistically and religiously intolerant. The French Metis experienced violence and a general disregard for their land rights.

Implications
As a result of discrimination and mistreatment experienced many French Metis migrated further West. Racist attitudes towards Indigenous and Métis people contributed to their isolation and economic difficulties, as many were denied jobs and other opportunities because of their race and the perceived negative stereotypes associated with being "Indian". These stereotypes included laziness, promiscuity and uncleanliness. Indeed, racially based interpretations of human behavior which were prevalent among european settlers at the time restricted Métis people's ability to advance through company ranks or gain meaningful employment. The increasing importance of land ownership which accompanied european migration meant Métis people, who often did not have recognized title to their land, were stripped of the land they had been cultivating and living on. In addition, the imposition of the township land holding system in western Canada resulted in the departure of many Metis families from the Red River area. The Métis agricultural system was based on the french-canadian style river lot farms.
Date
1870-00-00