Residential Schools

Work Program at Duck Lake/St. Michael's Residential School

Summary

In 1909, Principal Charlebois, of the Duck Lake/St. Michael's Residential School received permission to send students from the school to work in the homes of local white families. The students were supposed to be well treated and not over worked with their wages being saved by the school. In practice, only girls were sent into service. The Department hoped that these girls would be married to "reliable ex-pupils or other Indians on the Reserve." No money was given to the school in receipt of the girls' labor. The parents complained about the situation as they were sending their children to be educated, not to work for white people. As a result of these complaints and at the behest of the Duck Lake Indian Agent, the program was discontinued by the Department.

Implications
The Indian Residential School system only marginally pursued goals of educating Indigenous children. This is demonstrated by the average workday being divided into two portions, one half of which was for book learning and religious instruction, and the other half for manual/domestic labor on the school grounds. With this structuring of the school/workday, it was not possible for Indigenous children to achieve the same level of education as their non-Indigenous counterparts. Thus, they were not being prepared to be equal competitors in the workforce. Rather, the structure of their training provides strong evidence that they were being prepared to enter the workforce as manual laborers and domestic servants, thus perpetuating their lower socioeconomic status and preventing socioeconomic advancement. The work program at St. Michael’s Indian Residential School was a logical extension of the racist logic that Indigenous peoples were inherently intellectually inferior to the non-Indigenous population, and thus unlikely to or incapable of aspiring to jobs with professional designations such as doctor, lawyer, clergy, etc. The fact that the work program was only implemented with Indigenous female students is suggestive of gender targeting, as these female students would have been socialized, according to the pre-suffragette Victorian Christian morals of the era, to be submissive and docile. It is also likely, in keeping with the overall ethos of the residential school system, that they would have been socialized to demonstrate an attitude of thankfulness and gratitude for the opportunities granted to them by the school system and white society in providing education and work experience. As such, Indigenous people, particularly Indigenous girls and women were perceived as being highly undeserving of autonomy, either social or political. The staff at St. Michaels and the white employers, therefore, sought to exploit the voicelessness and vulnerability of these girls by appropriating them for domestic slave labor.
Date
1909-00-00

One Arrow Band Requests that their Children be sent to Duck Lake/St. Michael's Boarding School

Summary

In 1895, the One Arrow Band requested that their children be sent to the Duck Lake/St. Michael's Boarding School. Previously, the One Arrow Band refused to send their children to any boarding schools. However, they had been warned by the local Indian Agent that if they didn't send their children to any school they would be taken by force and sent wherever the Department wished.

Implications
The One Arrow Band was coerced/forced into letting their children attend Residential School. Despite protests from parents, their wishes were ignored. It is important to note that treaties stipulated access to education for Indigenous children, but under the control and advisory of Indigenous governments. This incident (common across Canada) shows that the Government did not honour treaty, and they assumed that religious, Eurocentric education was more beneficial to Indigenous children (which has been proven highly incorrect).
Date
1895-00-00

Physical Abuse of Students at All Saints School

Summary

A former student at All Saints School, Shirley Bear, recalled being abused by the vice principal. Shirley's brother had recently run away from the school, and she was accused of saying in Cree that she was also going to run away if her brother did not return. Mr. Mayo, the vice principal, believed her to be lying and so he hit her on the back, arms, and legs. Bear described this as "the worst strapping of [her] whole life." She was not beaten because Mr. Mayo wanted her to speak Cree, but because he believed she was lying when she said she could not speak the language. Mr. Mayo is quoted by Shirley Bear as saying, "Don't be stupid, all Indians speak Cree". Shirley recalls having feelings of confusion because she constantly saw children being beater for speaking in Cree, and when she admitted to not being able to speak the language, she was beaten for only being able to speak English. She also recalled how under Mr. Mayo, bullying and fighting amongst students was common. Staff did not protect students from the authorities, nor did they protect them from other students.

Implications
These incidents at All Saints School reflect a pattern of abuse that was endemic to the Residential School System. For more information see, 'Physical Abuse in Residential Schools,' and 'Sexual Abuse in Residential Schools.'
Date
1948-00-00

Punishment for Stealing Beans at File Hills Residential School

Summary

Sam Bear, a 17 year old grade 8 student at File Hills School in 1926, was caught stealing a mouthful of beans from the kitchen. As punishment, Sam was forced to eat nothing but beans at a table setup just for him in the middle of the dinning room in front of his fellow students. When Sam refused to eat anymore beans the matron held his mouth open and "shoved in the beans." This punishment went on for about a month.

Implications
This form of punishment reflects a pattern of abuse that was endemic throughout the Residential School System. Punishments for infractions by the students, even minor ones, were often unjustifiably cruel and malicious. Punishments often included an element of publicly shaming students in front of their peers as is seen in this particular instance. For more information on the abuse within residential schools see; 'Physical Abuse in Residential Schools' and 'Runaways and Student Truancy in the Residential Schools.
Date
1926-00-00

Suicides at the Muscowequan Residential School

Summary

In June of 1981 at Muscowequan Residential School, 5 or 6 girls between the ages of 8 and 10 attempted suicide by hanging. Earlier in the year, a 15 year old died by suicide.

Implications
In addition to running away, some students resorted to suicide as way to escape the abuse and the environments it caused that was prevalent within residential schools. Suicides are evidence that conditions in Residential Schools were unbearably difficult, traumatizing, and inescapable for children. Suicide, specifically youth suicide, remains a pertinent problem in many Indigenous communities - some local governments identifying it as a state of emergency. Suicide, poor mental health, addictions, and more can all manifest themselves as a result of intergenerational trauma from Residential Schooling. For more information on this subject see; "Physical Abuse in the Residential Schools' and "Runaways and Student Truancy in the Residential School System.'
Sources

(INAC File E 4974-2018, Vol. 1, H. Lanner to G. SInclair, 22 June 1981.)

Fill

Suicides at the Muscowequan Residential School

Date
1981-00-00
Community

Physical Abuse and Racism at Muscowequan/Lestock Indian Residential School

Summary

In the Muscowequan Indian Residential School it was common practice for staff to punish children who had urinated in their bed by draping the soiled sheet over the child’s head and requiring them to stand in front of their peers, often for an hour or more. Children were also made to scrub toilets as punishment for flatulence. Ears and hair were pulled continuously to reprimand students for speaking their Indigenous languages. Students who had the darkest skin were made to scrub themselves with a floor brush in an attempt to make their skin less dark. During Easter, one student recalls being made to kneel in prayer for hours at a time, from 6:00am going straight through to 11:00am, during which time many of the children would faint. Girls who were caught running away had their heads shaved and were forced to work in the kitchen, an area highly visible to students.

Implications
These examples from the Muscowequan/Lestock Indian Residential School reflect a pattern of physical and emotional abuse which was endemic throughout the residential school system as a whole. For more information on this topic see the entry; 'Physical Abuse in Residential Schools.'
Fill

Physical Abuse and Racism at Muscowequan/Lestock Indian Residential School

Date
1948-00-00
Community

Runaways from Round Lake Residential School

Summary

In January of 1935, 3 boys ran away from the Round Lake Residential School and attempted to return home to the Ochapowace Reserve. Glen Gaddie and Alec Wasacase made it to their homes safely while Percy Ochapowace got lost in a blizzard and froze to death as the temperature was below 25 degrees (F).

Implications
The coroner in charge of the incident decided that no inquest was necessary into the death of Percy Ochapowace. The principal of the school was told that he should have sent out a search team immediately, although no charges were laid against him. The treatment of Percy Ochapowace following his death indicates the lack of care that the government had for students of Residential Schools. For more information on the topic see; 'Runaways and Student Truancy in the Residential School System.'
Fill

IRS

Date
1935-01-00
Community

Runaways and the Residential School System

Summary

 

            Running away was a consistent response to the frequent pattern of abuse within the Residential School system. According to the testimony of one survivor, Joe Kapoeze, his experience at school consisted of watching over the children as they tended to farm work such as milking cows. Kapoeze recalled, "As I got bigger, I got another job and this time I watched over the kids. I used to watch the school children and wasn’t really being teached in school and that’s why I don’t know anything. I was always working and if I’m not doing anything, they would teach us about religious things, so I didn’t really learn anything at all.” Due to this, Joe felt it would be better to run away home where he knew he would learn more and be treated better.

Implications
In 1967, Assistant Deputy Minister, R.F. Battle, admitted "It is not uncommon for Indian children to run away." Often, students who ran away did so as a response to physical, sexual, verbal, spiritual, and/or emotional abuse. Children not only ran away in ones and twos but sometimes en masse. On May 7, 1953, "all 32 boys in [a Saskatchewan school] were truant...following disciplinary action." If caught, the students were usually returned to their school, sometimes being held in jail until they were retrieved by a representative of the school. Some of those who were not caught and returned to the school made it to their homes. However, occasionally student runaways resulted in the deaths of children (four student deaths occurred in this manner during the decade of 1957-1967); drowning, freezing, and starvation were just some of the causes of death. Not every missing child or death was recorded by the schools, however, so the true numbers remain obscured due to the lack of documentation.

In 1971, the Department of Indian Affairs attempted to address student runaways with a policy that was supposed to find solutions that school, field staff, and community officials could search for runaways “more effectively.” This new policy included "residence staff to be alert during times of severe weather," "emphasizing the need for discussion of the problems of runaways," and the "implementation of a regular program of survival training for students." The policy focused on steps to take after the students had run away, while failing to address the reasons why students were willing to risk their lives to leave schools in the first place.
Sources

(INAC File 772/23-16-010, Vol. 1, 2 May 1953.) (INAC File 487/25-1-014, Vol. 1, 27 August 1963) (INAC File 487/25-1-014, Vol. 1, R.F. Battle to The Acting Minister, 26 January 1967.) (N.A.C. RG 10, Vol. 6186 File 460-23, Part 1, 14 June 1941) (N.A.C. RG 10 Vol. 6332, File 661-1, Part 2, MR C 9810, J. Ostrander to Sir. 19 January 1935) (INAC File 961/25-1, Vol. 1) (INAC File 451/25-2-004, Vol. 2, 9 September 1968) (INAC File 377/25-13, Vol. 1, Verdict of Coroner's Jury, 17 December 1970) (INAC File 377/25-13, Vol. 1, J.B. Bergevin to H.B. Cotnam, M.D., 1 March 1971) (INAC File 487/25-1-014, Vol. 1, R.F. Battle to the Acting Minister, 26 January 1967)

The Truth and Reconciliation Council. "They Came For the Children."  Winnipeg, MB: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 2012. 52.

Milloy, John S. A National Crime: The Canadian Government and the Residential School  System, 1879 to 1986. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, 1999. 284-287.

Helen and Joe Wheaton. Interview by Murray Dobbin. ”Helen and Joe Wheaton interview on Metis experiences of discrimination, land dispossession and economic activity.” Transcript. Gabriel Dumont Institute Visual Museum Oral Histories Archive. June   17, 1976,           http://www.metismuseum.ca/media/document.php/01089.Wheaton,%20Helen.pd f          

Date
1876-00-00

Student Attempts to Runaway from Gordon Indian Residence

Summary

During her time at Gordon Indian Residence from 1959-1964, Geraldine Sanderson recalls that "every once in a while students would run away." Geraldine recalls that travelling from James Smith Reserve to the Gordon Residence required over three hours by bus. Because of the distance, runaways students rarely made it home before being apprehended and punished. Punishment varied according to gender. For example, she recalls one boy being forced to remove his pants in front of students, after which he received 10-15 lashes from the principal with a leather strap. Girls often had their heads shaved.

Implications
These incidents at Gordon Indian Residence reflect a larger pattern of abuse and student runaways, and the reasons behind escape represented a prevalent problem throughout the residential school system. Harsh, often physical punishment for runaways was common and undoubtedly led to a further desire to leave Residential Schools. For more information see; 'Runaways and Student Truancy in the Residential School System.'
Fill

Student Attempts to Runaway from Gordon Indian Residence

Date
1959-00-00

Fire at Lac La Ronge Mission Indian Residential School

Summary

In 1947, the Lac La Ronge Mission Indian Residential School burnt down in a fire that was reportedly caused by some of the students. Supposedly the students started the fire in an attempt to destroy the school so that they would be either sent home or able to runaway. The school, which had previously burnt down in 1920 and been rebuilt, was moved to Prince Albert along with its students and renamed All Saints School - Lac La Ronge.

Implications
Setting fire to residential schools was not an uncommon form of student resistance, and is indicative of the psychologically and physically oppressive environment experienced by students. In total there were over 50 major fires at residential schools with students being responsible for burning down Saint-Paul-des Metis, Alert Bay, Kuper Island, the Mohawk Institute, Mount Elgin, and Delmas residential schools in addition to Lac la Ronge. For more information on this topic see, "Runaways and Student Truancy in the Residential School System.'
Date
1947-00-00
Community