Local Governance

North-West/Riel Resistance

Summary

Mimicking the strategy that led to the formation of Manitoba at the end of the Red River Resistance, Riel announced his intention to form a provisional government to a group at St. Laurent on March 8, 1885. This announcement was supplemented by a Revolutionary Bill of Rights. Riel justified the timing referencing the imminent war between England and Russia, stating that the British could not come to Canada’s aid. After a “novena” (nine days of public prayers to consult one's conscience and obtain special divine graces) the provisional government was officially formed. Riel outlined that the provisional government would remain peaceful and disband if their requests were granted; however, if they were refused they would be forced to resort to violence. The formation of the provisional government resulted in the counter interference of the NWMP.

Implications
The North-West Resistance was not one continuous battle or war, rather, a collection of numerous scrimmages between different Métis, First Nations, and early settlers in the West against colonial troops sent in by Ottawa and those who helped them. Lead by Louis Riel with support from Gabriel Dumont, the Provisional government took the church parish at Batoche and demanded that the HBC surrender Fort Carlton nearby. Numerous outbreaks of conflict at Duck Lake, Battleford, Fish Creek, Cut Knife, Frog Lake, and finally Batoche were a response to the growing frustrations with the government over a refusal to acknowledge certain land rights, a fear of settler encroachment, and dwindling food resources that had failed to been addressed. A considerable portion of First Nations refused or feared their involvement in the resistance being wary of the Government’s potential response. In numerous cases, First Nations leaders and bands were wrongfully accused of being agitators and contributing to the violence.
Sources

Toronto Mail, 13 April 1885.

Beal, Bob, and Macleod, R. C. Prairie Fire: The 1885 North-West Rebellion. Toronto:     McClelland & Stewart, 1994. 135-136, 141-143.

Archibald-Barber, Jesse Rae. Kisiskâciwan: Indigenous Voices from Where the River Flows        Swiftly Regina: University of Regina Press, 2018. 59-69.

Sub Event
Creation of Provisional Government
Date
1885-03-08

Northern and Southern Metis Political Organizations Merge into Métis Society of Saskatchewan

Summary

In the 1930s the diverse needs of Metis individuals in various areas of the province, coupled with distinct leadership visions and significant geographic distance, resulted in two Metis organizations that represented the Northern and Southern regions of the province, with the dividing line being Saskatoon. In 1967, both groups merged into the pre-existing Métis Society of Saskatchewan, which thenceforth represented both northern and southern regions of the province.

Implications
Hypothetically, this unification would provide more cohesion for the Metis of Saskatchewan, and potentially, greater political clout.
Date
1967-00-00

Metis Association of Saskatchewan Forms Local Branches

Summary

Jim Brady and Malcolm Norris (leaders of the Metis Association of Saskatchewan who also formed the Metis Association of Alberta) established local chapters in Saskatchewan communities outside of the scope of the Metis Society of Saskatchewan in places such as Prince Albert and Meadow Lake.

Implications
This marked the beginning of political organization for Metis peoples in the Prince Albert and Meadow Lake regions. As the years progressed, the organization would become increasingly cohesive with Metis in the rest of the province. Sanderson (see interview excerpt below in "relevant resources) notes that language was a barrier in political consciousness-raising. In another interview contained in the entry "Metis Society of Saskatchewan - Implementation and Removal of Education and Housing Programs", Joe Amyotte notes that recruiting Metis members for the Metis Society was difficult because of an internalized sense of ethnic inferiority as well as a fear of being laughed at.
Date
1930-00-00
Theme(s)

Petitions sent to Regina and Ottawa from Metis in the Constituency of Lorne

Summary

Between 1882 and 1885 Metis peoples living in the Batoche region (called the Constituency of Lorne during the period) sent various petitions to the Territorial Government in Regina and the Federal Government in Ottawa. The main concern of the petitions was the recognition of land rights and the surveying of the Metis river lot system. Government response was vague and no action was taken.

Implications
The Métis became increasingly discouraged and impatient with the inaction of the Canadian government. This sentiment led to the various “secret meetings” in the 1880s, where the Metis drew up grievances and considered a plan of action to claim their requested rights. The Metis peoples decided to bring Louis Riel back from Montana to aid with these issues.
Sources

SBHS, SBAA, Journal of Father Gabriel Cloutier, Charles Nolin and Maxime Lépine’s depositions, p. 5174-5176. Charles Nolin’s testimony, LAC, RG13, B2, C-1231.

Date
1881-00-00

Cree Council at Fort Qu'Appelle

Summary

In 1857, Cree leaders attended a council at Fort Qu'Appelle, demanding that traders procure bison meat from Cree hunters instead of hunting it for themselves.

Implications
This was an attempt by Cree leaders to regulate the use of bison, as herds began to dwindle with an increasing Euro-Canadian presence in the Northwest. However, with the increased presence of settlers, and settler-altered migration patterns of the bison, bison numbers would dwindle devastatingly low and Indigenous peoples on the plains would be without a keystone resource integral to their ways of life.
Sources

Irene Spry, "The Tragedy of the Loss of the Commons in Western Canada," in As Long As the Sun Shines and Water Flows, ed. Getty and Lussier

Sub Event
Proactive measures proposed by Cree council to prevent buffalo near-extinction in 1857.
Date
1857-00-00
Theme(s)

Provincial Conferences of Saskatchewan Indian Chiefs and Councillors at Fort Qu'Appelle

Summary

One hundred and three councillors and Chiefs attended a conference of Indigenous leaders in Fort Qu'Appelle on October 30, 1958, during which Premier T.C. Douglas presented proposals on liquor and voting rights. In an effort to implement an integrationist policy, Douglas sought to pass legislation extending provincial voting rights to First Nations, removing restrictions on the sale of liquor on reserves, and the transfer of responsibility from Indian Affairs to the provincial government. The issue of provincial franchise was controversial since the term resembled "enfranchisement", the term used in the Indian Act to describe a colonial process by which an someone lost their ‘Indian Status,’ gained the vote, and were forced to leave their reserve. Since enfranchisement meant the loss of material goods and a ‘legal identity,’ many First Nations peoples were hesitant to accept the vote. Others felt that allowing liquor on reserves was not in the best interest of their populations.

Following deliberations, those present advised Douglas to wait until further consultations with band members had completed so as to avoid conflict. This conference also saw the creation of the Federation of Saskatchewan Indians (FSI), a unified organization for Indigenous peoples across the province. As the government's policies faced rejection Douglas’ government aimed to adopt a more consultative style, and created an Advisory Committee composed of one Indigenous member from each of the nine agencies in the province. The committee was set up to help plan the next conference and consult with members on reserves. A second conference took place at Fort Qu'Appelle on October 20 and 21, 1959. As with the first conference, no consensus was obtained regarding voting and liquor rights.

Implications
A motion was eventually passed that granted franchise to First Nations in the province, although it was passed without their consent and contrary to what Douglas had promised. Douglas gave three reasons for the action: voting would not jeopardize treaty rights, politicians were more apt to listen to Indigenous peoples if they were voters, and, according to Douglas, many young people said they wanted the vote. However, throughout Douglas’ premiership were frequent objections from Indigenous leaders, such as John Tootoosis and Andrew Paull), who expressed their anger and frustration with the CCF and “white men’s” interference on Indian affairs and policy. This was due to the fact that CCF officials frequently called meetings of the FSI, pressed the Federal government for policy change on behalf of the FSI, and pressured FSI leadership to adopt colonial policies and ‘lifestyles’ in place of Indigenous self-governance and control of resources.
Sources

Barron, F.L., Walking in Indian Moccasins: the native policies of Tommy Douglas and the CCF, 80-82.

 

Pitsula, James. "The Saskatchewan CCF Government and Treaty Indians, 1944-1964." Canadian Historical Review 75, no. 1 (1994): 33-34.

 

Saskatchewan Archives Board, Douglas Papers, R-33.1 XLV 864d (49) 4/6 "Indians" Cabinet Memorandum, November 7, 1958.

Date
1958-10-30

Organization of Cree/Blackfoot Meeting in Montana

Summary

Cree bands from Western Canada organized to meet with Little Pine and Big Bear in Montana. These Cree groups had also negotiated a tenuous alliance with the Blackfoot, who planned to attend the meeting. Typically, the government was suspicious when meetings occurred amongst Indigenous nations - in keeping with the larger pattern, this meeting inspired paranoia amongst colonial officials. Ultimately, the meeting did not take place due to an unexpected raid on the Crow, leading American officials to order the return of the Cree and Blackfoot to Canada. The accord between the Blackfoot and the Cree soon fell apart.

Sources

PAC RG 10 vol. 3739, file 28748-1, Dewdney to Macdonald, 3 April 1882; Fred White to Minister of the Interior, 9 June 1882; Freylinghausen to Sackville-West, 9 June 1882. Saskatchewan Herald, 1 August 1881; "Starving Indians," Benton Weekly Record, 14 July 1881; 25 August, 1 September, 13 October 1881 PAC RG 10, vol. 3739, file 28478-1, C.G Denny to Commissioner, 24 October 1881; Vol. 3768, file 33,642; vol. 3603 file 20141, McIlree to Dewdney, 21 June 1882 Glenbow Institute Calgary, Edward Dewdney Papers, v, file 57, Irvine to Dewdney, 24 June 1882; Saskatchewan Herald, 24 June 1882

Date
1881-00-00
Theme(s)

Council of Chiefs at Duck Lake

Summary

This council was a follow-up to the council held at Carlton earlier that summer. Beardy called Carlton signatories to Duck Lake and drew up eight promises that had not been fulfilled in treaty making.

Sources

Speech given by Beardy to meeting at Duck Lake: "Yes, I am willing to speak. Since the leaves have begun to come it is why I have been walking, walking, trying to make myself understood. It is why I have come to Duck Lake. To show you why I have been so anxious, it is because I have been trying to seize the promises which they made to me, I have been grasping but I cannot send them. What they have promised me straightway I have not yet seen the half of it. We have all been deceived in the same way. It is the cause of our meeting at Duck Lake. They offered me a spot as a reserve. As I see that they are not going to be honest I am afraid to take a reserve. They have given me to choose between several small reserves but I feel sad to abandon the liberty of my own land when they come to me and offer me small plots to stay there and in return not to get half of what they have promised me. When will you have a big meeting. It has come to me as through the bushes that you are not yet all united, take time and become united, and I will speak. The Government sent to us those who think themselves men. They bring everything crooked. They take our lands, they sell hem and they buy themselves fine clothes. Then they clap their hands on their hips and call themselves men. They are not men. They have no honesty. They are an unsightly beast. Their faces are twisted from the appearance of honest men." - July 31, 1884 Duck Lake (Kisiskâciwan: Indigenous Voices from Where the River Flows Swiftly, 40-41).

Date
1884-07-00

Metis St. Laurent Council

Summary

Metis peoples emigrating from Manitoba to the South Saskatchewan River Valley wanted to assert their political authority. The St. Laurent Council’s first assembly was held on 10 December 1872, Gabriel Dumont was elected president. Between 1873 and 1875 twenty eight laws were updated to allow the St. Laurent Council to regulate and oversee various aspects of life in the North West Territories, including the hunt. As deterrents to follow these rules the council would often levy fines. In the spring of 1875 a conflict developed after HBC employee Peter Ballantine violated the rules of the St. Laurent constitution and left for the annual hunt in advance of the main party. With the assent of the general assembly, Gabriel Dumont levied a fine on the offenders. Ballantine complained to HBC officer Lawrence Clark, who asked the local NWMP to intervene. An expedition of fifty NWMP led by Colonel French was sent to pressure the Metis to give up local power. Dumont and the council did so.

Implications
This conflict led to a complete dissolution of the St. Laurent Council’s power over key economic activities, as Colonel French’s expedition undermined the power and authority of the Metis council. The Metis loss of power was compounded by the fact the Metis on the South Saskatchewan River had no delegates or representation in the Territorial Government in the 1870s. It was not until 1881 when the electoral district of Lorne was created and that the Metis in Duck Lake, St. Laurent and Batoche had the ability to elect an official to the Territorial Government. Furthermore, the dissolution of the St. Laurent Council ended the Metis regulation of the bison hunt. This situation quickened the decline of the bison population forcing Metis peoples to alter their way of life.
Sources

PAA, Oblate Collection, St. Laurent-de-Grandin Parish Records, item 5 (St. Laurent Chronicles, 1875). PAC, RG 18Al, vol.1, no. 333, Colonel French to the Federal Minister of Justice, 17 August 1875.

Sub Event
Assertion of rights of self-government are met with government oppression
Date
1875-00-00