Integration & Mobility

Establishment of Metis Hivernements (Wintering Camps) in Present Day Saskatchewan

Summary

In the nineteenth century Métis from the Red River began establishing temporary settlements in present-day Saskatchewan. Camps were positioned in the Qu’Appelle Valley, Cypress Hills, and Chapelle (near Willow Bunch, Saskatchewan). By the 1860s, additional seasonal encampments were erected at Prairie Ronde (near Dundurn, SK), Grosse-Butte (near Humbolt, SK) and Petite-Ville (Near Fish Creek, SK). These "hivernant" communities were a Métis response to the changing economic and social conditions in the western interior. They were also a important element in the development of plains Métis identity in the later half of the 19th century. The camps were a response to the westward retreat of the buffalo herds and the changing nature of the fur trade economy. As the buffalo herds kept moving westward, it was no longer possible to live on the Red River Settlement and hunt at the same time, as it required hundreds of kilometers of travel before any buffalo were in sight. An increasing amount of plains Métis families began spending their winters in small temporary communities, west of the Red River, where they could easily hunt the buffalo. The wintering sites varied in size from a few families to large camps with thousands of inhabitants. The Métis settled in sufficient numbers to protect themselves against attacks by rival native bands, and where water and wood were easily accessible, near to where the buffalo were expected to be during the winter months. The social and material components of the hivernant camps were similar regardless of size or locality. As the buffalo populations began to dwindle in the late 1870's/1880's, these hivernant communities lost their economic function. Some communities such as St-Laurent and Batoche made the transition to agriculture, while many others simply disappeared.


 

Result

Although the wintering camps had only a short existence, they constituted a critical historical experience that saw plains Métis households come together as communities. These hivernements or winter camps were forerunners to permanent Métis settlements established later in the nineteenth century.  Some of the temporary camps which developed into permanent communities such as St-Laurent and Batoche  played important roles in Métis history. The fact that these hivernements camps acted as temporary communities aided in the development and preservation of Métis culture and language, Michif. Although the wintering camps played a part in the development of Métis culture and language, both these cultural practices pre-dated the camps. The development of Métis language, culture, identity and nationhood paved the way for the creation of Métis political and social structures, as well as the Métis fight to recognition of land title and political independence. 


 

Fill

 

Date
1840-00-00

Large Metis Contingent Emigrates to South Saskatchewan River Valley

Summary

In 1882 a large group of Metis peoples emigrated permanently to the South Saskatchewan River Valley.

Implications
The emigration of Metis peoples westward was a result of the increased settler presence, racism, and displacement eastward in Manitoba. This emigration transformed Batoche, St. Louis and St. Laurent into permanent settlements. Permanent Metis settlements (along with local First Nations peoples) would resist the Canadian Government during the Northwest Resistance, specifically at the Battle of Batoche.
Sources

DA, Father A Andre, “Mémorial en réponse au questionnaire du R.P. Visiteur, octobre 1883.”

Date
1882-00-00

Division of Little Red River Reserve

Summary

On February 16, 1889, people from La Ronge and Montreal Lake gathered at the mouth of the Montreal River for the purpose of signing Treaty 6. No land was alloted at the time of the signing since the people were trappers and fishermen and ranged over the entire area south of Foster Lake and north of what is currently known as Waskesiu. In 1896, land was set aside south of Prince Albert National Park for those members of Montreal Lake and La Ronge who wished to farm.The Little Red River Reserve was officially divided between the Lac La Ronge and Montreal Lake bands in 1948, making band governance and control over this land much easier. Even up until 1948 the bands had been fighting off petitions for the sale of their land, and the division made dealing with these petitions much easier.

Implications
The division of this reserve, along with changes to the boundary of Prince Albert National Park, gave members of Montreal Lake and Lac La Ronge bands greater access to lands in this region.
Date
1948-00-00

Creation of Little Red River Reserve

Summary

Reserve land was set aside to be shared by Montreal Lake and Lac La Ronge bands for farming. Both bands have their main reserve many kilometres further north, where farming is not feasible. The division of this land between two bands, especially considering its prime location near Prince Albert, has created problems over ownership and who has authority to make decisions about land use and sales.

Date
1897-00-00

Creation of Prince Albert National Park

Summary

Prince Albert National Park was created, making a large section of mid-central land into a tourist destination and conservation area. The introduction of park guardians also meant the area was under greater surveillance, and both First Nations and Metis could be fined or punished for trespassing or hunting. Officials were aware that the creation of the park would cause serious hardship for the Indigenous people of the locality.

Implications
Those who lived in the region of Prince Albert National Park were no longer allowed to hunt, trap, or fish within the park's boundaries. For those who relied on the land to make their living in this area, the creation of the park was economically devastating. This was particularly true for those who resided on the Little Red River Reserve, as they were cut off from their traditional boreal forest resources. Concerns were raised regarding Bittern Lake, where most of the population had obtained their sources of white fish - this lake was now to be incorporated into the park boundaries. The creation of this park also displaced Metis peoples who had been living in the area - please see the entry on road allowance economy for more details on the precarious living situations that many Metis experienced within Saskatchewan.
Date
1928-00-00

Arrival of Forces of Colonel Garnet Wolseley in Manitoba

Summary

The arrival of the expedition under Colonel Garnet Wolseley in 1870 signalled a transition in the lives Indigenous peoples in Manitoba. The expedition included Ontario volunteers and Canadian settlers hoping to avenge the death of Thomas Scott. They acted in defiance of the rule of law. Winnipeg descended into mob rule in 1871 and 1872. The French Metis population was threatened continuously at the Land Office near Fort Garry, and French Metis entering Winnipeg were in jeopardy of being harmed.

Implications
The arrival of Wolseley’s force, and the continued flood of new settlers, many of whom were linguistically and religiously intolerant, led to a great exodus of many French Métis between 1870 and 1881. Many French Metis individuals migrated West into Saskatchewan. In some cases, they sold their land to incoming English Protestants as the Métis were being pushed out of their communities.
Date
1870-00-00

Red River Resistance, Manitoba Act of 1870 and Reign of Terror

Summary

The Manitoba Act was passed at the closing of the Red River Resistance in 1870, which provided for the province of Manitoba and allowed the Red River settlement to enter Confederation as Canada's fifth province. Prime Minister J.A. MacDonald stated that he would compensate the Metis in the new province in order to settle the west peacefully, although the provincial land would be owned publicly. There were also provisions in the Act which protected the French language and Roman Catholic religion. Section 31 of the Act provided land for the children of Metis heads of families, which amounted to 1.4 million acres, to be divided into tracts and allotted to Métis families by Lieutenant-Governor Adam Archibald. Section 32 guaranteed all previous settlers possession of the lots they occupied before 15 July 1870, as well as hay rights in the outer two miles of various river lots. An amendment to section 32 in 1874 provided $160 scrip redeemable by Métis heads of families. The 1874 amendment also stated that improvements needed to be made to the land in order to obtain the title. Following the creation of the Manitoba Act, Prime Minister MacDonald refused to distribute the land legally owed to Metis people. The plan of Lieutenant Governor Archibald was to allow the Metis to maintain the river lot system of farming and distribute the 1.4 million acres over a period of approximately one year. Distribution of land in fulfillment of section 31 took over a decade, however, causing many frustrated Metis people to migrate west into Alberta and Saskatchewan, as well as the United States. As well, government officials changed their minds about the 1.4 million acres, stating that the claimed land was now required to be outside the province of Manitoba. They also changed the date of proof of occupation to a date when most Metis would be away from their farms hunting buffalo. Shortly after the Act was passed, MacDonald sent 1200 troops to Fort Garry (now known as Winnipeg), to surveil and control the new province. The troops, as well as the influx of settlers, terrorized the Metis residents. Many Metis individuals were murdered, beaten, and raped. Metis landholders were frequently harassed in non-physical ways as well.


 

Result

The above summary of events demonstrates that there were several federal tactics employed to make it exceedingly difficult for the Metis to obtain their land title after scrip had been issued.  Prime Minister MacDonald actively vetoed the plans of Lieutenant Governor Archibald, in the hopes that delaying the distribution of land to the Metis would allow white settlers to outnumber the Metis, forcing them to leave.  These federal delay tactics were effective, as many Metis migrated, although they continued to petition the government in Ottawa to settle their outstanding claims.  As well, the Metis were still involved in the buffalo economy.  The government was aware that many Metis families left their farms for extended periods of time while on the hunt, during which they allowed non-Aboriginal settlers to occupy and steal Metis farm lots .  As a result of these federal tactics, approximately 65 percent of Metis people lost their land to non-Aboriginal homesteaders in Manitoba.

The efforts of MacDonald to send a large number of troops into the newly formed province demonstrate a retaliatory effort to keep the region under tight state control.  The permissive attitude of the government towards methods of psychological and physical intimidation including murder, physical beatings and rape of an already oppressed people would have served to severely fracture the sense of community safety and family cohesion.  The psychological trauma caused by rape in particular is known to have long-term and even intergenerational consequences for emotional and mental health if appropriate or sufficient social supports are not available.  These tactics of physical and psychological violence were used to keep the Metis in a position of political subordination.  The researcher notes that in the era of the modern state, criteria provided by the United Nations in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court would classify the actions of the government as war crimes (extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly) and crimes against humanity (murder, rape, persecution based on ethnicity). 


 

Sources
  • An Act to amend and continue the Act 32 and 33 Victoria, chapter 3 ; and to establish and provide for the Government of the Province of Manitoba, S.C. 1870, c. 3

 

Fill

 

Date
1870-05-12
Documents
File

Community Development Submission to Cabinet

Summary

In the 1960s, disparities between Indigenous welfare expenditures and settler welfare expenditures were significant, with spending on the former outweighing the latter. As a result, the government saw a need to counter the growing welfare expenditures. Walter Rudnicki pitched a community development program to cabinet which called on provinces to partially assume the expenses of health and welfare transfer payments. This proposal also vaguely focused on increased self-sufficiency for Indigenous peoples, although no concrete steps were outlined. Cabinet approved the program on May 28, 1964.

Implications
This program was, in effect, a large-scale integration (and assimilation) policy, as confirmed by Rudnicki had confirmed himself. It was believed that removing the fiduciary obligation of Indigenous welfare from the federal government and distributing it to provincial and band governments would remove the status of Indigenous peoples (at this time, status only applied to First Nations as Inuit and Métis). The Government argued that status supposedly prevented them from being economically responsible, permitting 'dependence on federal welfare.' Removing the status of Indigenous peoples at this time threatened the protections and Treaty rights that had been agreed upon by signatories nearly a century prior. This would allow the government to legally steam-roll Indigenous peoples with a new access to Indigenous lands and resources as title to them would be extinguished with the removal of 'status.'
Sources

NAC, RG-10, CR Series, Vol. 8194, File 1/29-6, Part 3, Memorandum to Cabinet, 'Community Development, Indian Affairs Branch,' February 1964, with covering memorandum to the Deputy Minister, C.M Isbister from R.F Battle, Director, Indian Affairs Branch, Ottawa, n.d, items 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9

Sub Event
Community Development Submission to Cabinet
Date
1964-02-00

Sakimay Reserve Surveyed at Crooked Lakes

Summary

The first band to settle on a reserve at Crooked Lakes was Sakimay. This band already had houses on this land and were already using the land for agriculture. Their 5020 km reserve was surveyed North of the Qu'Appelle River, near Crooked Lake.

Sources

McKay’s report, 1876 [NA, RG 10, vol. 3642, file 7581]

Date
1876-00-00
Community

Dreaver Report

Summary

Written by Chief Joseph Dreaver of Mistawasis, this report surveyed 67 bands in Saskatchewan and called for band control and administration of land. In response, L.L Brown suggested that there was a necessity for bands to accept Euro-Canadian land divisions if they wished to integrate into Canadian society.

Implications
The response of L.L. Brown is indicative of the privileging of Eurocentric perceptions of land use and ownership, as well as disregard for the capacity of Indigenous peoples to self-govern. This is a continuation of colonial attitudes that were introduced at Contact, as Europeans dismissed Indigenous modes and philosophies of governance as inferior.
Sources

Report of Chief Joseph Dreaver, Sr, to the Indian Affairs Branch, December 6, 1962; Letter to the Executive Assistant to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Re: The Dreaver Report, from L.L Brown, Chief, Agencies Division, Indian Affairs Branch, 3 January 1963. [NAC, RG-10, CR Series, Vol. 8584, File 1/1-2-16]

Date
1962-00-00