Federal Governance

Rupert's Land Transfer

Summary

Since 1670 the Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) had held an exclusive trade monopoly over all lands where water drained into Hudson Bay. In 1870 the Dominion of Canada gained control over this vast territory (and consecutively renamed it the North-West Territories) for the price of 300,000 Pounds.

Implications
The Rupert's Land Transfer provided Canada with the right under British law to extract resources from the region, while also leading to a promotion of settlement and agricultural development of fertile areas. This initiated significant transformation in the West and it also incited anger amongst many Metis and First Nations peoples who were not consulted in the sale or transfer of their territories. While the transfer and desire to promote settlement in the North-West Territories led towards the negotiation of treaties with the region's First Nations inhabitants, the land rights of the Metis were ignored, eventually resulting in the resistances of 1870 and 1885.
Sources

Morton, Arthur S. "Copy of draft surrender of Rupert's Land to the Queen, to be transferred for union with the Dominion of Canada." Enclosure in Earl Granville's despatches, no. 109. 12 June 1869. Morton, Arthur S. "Copy of the Order-in-Council dated 23 June 1870, at Windsor Court, authorizing the transfer of Rupert's Land and the North West Territories by the Hudson's Bay Company to the Queen to be united with the Dominion of Canada." 23 June 1870.

Date
1869-11-19

Treaty 4 Adhesion

Summary

The final adhesion to Treaty 4 occurred in September, 1877 at Fort Walsh. Although Indigenous people did not cede their rights to the land, government officials recorded in the written document that they had. In exchange for transfer of title, the Dominion of Canada on behalf of the Queen promised to provide one-time presents, annual annuities, reserves, farming implements, the construction of schools, and guaranteed hunting, trapping and fishing rights.

Implications
As they did not speak or write English fluently, First Nations leaders relied on interpreters and oral agreements during the negotiations. Some of these agreements were not included in the written documents. As well, the Canadian Government avoided implementing aspects of the written treaty document to curb their spending. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Discontentment surrounded the implementation of Treaty 4. In the subsequent years and decades many First Nations signatories complained that the government was not preventing starvation, preserving their livelihoods, or their sovereignty. The government was continually reluctant to uphold their end of the negotiations, in fact, utilizing discriminatory policies that would cause undue harm to Indigenous peoples.These issues stemmed from differing interpretations of the treaty and its intentions by First Nations signatories compared to the Canadian Government. The debate over the intentions of the treaties continued throughout the twentieth century and into the twenty first century. However, while the government claimed ignorance to the true intention of treaties, they were assertive and completely aware of the assimilative policies implemented, and aimed to remove Indigenous peoples from Canadian society altogether.
Sub Event
Fort Walsh
Date
1877-09-25

Treaty 4 Adhesion

Summary

Additional adhesions to Treaty 4 occurred at Fort Pelly in the summer of 1876 under the supervision of A. McKay and W.H. Nagle. The First Nations communities agreed to the same terms initially agreed upon on September 15, 1874. Although First Nations leaders did not cede their rights to the land, government officials recorded in the written document that they had. In exchange for transfer of title, the Dominion of Canada on behalf of the Queen promised to provide one-time presents, annual annuities, farming implements, the construction of schools, and guaranteed hunting, trapping and fishing rights.

Implications
As they did not speak or write English fluently, First Nations leaders relied on interpreters and oral agreements during the negotiations. Some of these agreements were not included in the written documents. As well, the Canadian Government avoided implementing aspects of the written treaty document to curb their spending. -------------------------------------------------------- Discontentment surrounded the implementation of Treaty 4. In the subsequent years and decades many First Nations signatories complained that the government was not preventing starvation, preserving their livelihoods, or their sovereignty. The government was continually reluctant to uphold their end of the negotiations, in fact, utilizing discriminatory policies that would cause undue harm to Indigenous peoples. These issues stemmed from differing interpretations of the treaty and its intentions by First Nations signatories compared to the Canadian Government. The debate over the intentions of the treaties continued throughout the twentieth century and into the twenty first century. However, while the government claimed ignorance to the true intention of treaties, they were assertive and completely aware of the assimilative policies implemented, and aimed to remove Indigenous peoples from Canadian society altogether.
Sub Event
Fort Pelly
Date
1876-08-24

Treaty 4 Adhesion

Summary

At Swan Lake W.J. Christie (Indian Commissioner) and M.G. Dickieson (Acting commissioner) oversaw a new adhesion to Treaty 4. The Aboriginal communities agreed to the same terms initially agreed upon on September 15, 1874. Although they did not cede their rights to the land, government officials recorded in the written document that they had. In exchange for transfer of title, the Dominion of Canada on behalf of the Queen promised to provide one-time presents, annual annuities, reserves, farming implements, the construction of schools, and guaranteed hunting, trapping and fishing rights.

Implications
As they did not speak or write English fluently, First Nations leaders relied on interpreters and oral agreements during the negotiations. Some of these agreements were not included in the written documents. As well, the Canadian Government avoided implementing aspects of the written treaty document to curb their spending. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Discontentment surrounded the implementation of Treaty 4. In the subsequent years and decades many First Nations signatories complained that the government was not preventing starvation, preserving their livelihoods, or their sovereignty. The government was continually reluctant to uphold their end of the negotiations, in fact, utilizing discriminatory policies that would cause undue harm to Indigenous peoples.These issues stemmed from differing interpretations of the treaty and its intentions by First Nations signatories compared to the Canadian Government. The debate over the intentions of the treaties continued throughout the twentieth century and into the twenty first century. However, while the government claimed ignorance to the true intention of treaties, they were assertive and completely aware of the assimilative policies implemented, and aimed to remove Indigenous peoples from Canadian society altogether.
Sub Event
Swan Lake
Date
1875-09-24

Treaty 4 Adhesion

Summary

One day after a new adhestion had been signed to Treaty 4, there were various additional signatories to the treaty at the Qu’Appelle Lakes. The Aboriginal communities agreed to the same terms initially agreed upon on September 15, 1874. Although they did not cede their rights to the land, government officials recorded in the written document that they had. In exchange for transfer of title, the Dominion of Canada on behalf of the Queen promised to provide one-time presents, annual annuities, reserves, farming implements, the construction of schools, and guaranteed hunting, trapping and fishing rights.

Implications
As they did not speak or write English fluently, First Nations leaders relied on interpreters and oral agreements during the negotiations. Some of these agreements were not included in the written documents. As well, the Canadian Government avoided implementing aspects of the written treaty document to curb their spending. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Discontentment surrounded the implementation of Treaty 4. In the subsequent years and decades many First Nations signatories complained that the government was not preventing starvation, preserving their livelihoods, or their sovereignty. The government was continually reluctant to uphold their end of the negotiations, in fact, utilizing discriminatory policies that would cause undue harm to Indigenous peoples.These issues stemmed from differing interpretations of the treaty and its intentions by First Nations signatories compared to the Canadian Government. The debate over the intentions of the treaties continued throughout the twentieth century and into the twenty first century. However, while the government claimed ignorance to the true intention of treaties, they were assertive and completely aware of the assimilative policies implemented, and aimed to remove Indigenous peoples from Canadian society altogether.
Sub Event
Fort Qu'Appelle
Date
1875-09-09

Treaty 4 Adhesion

Summary

Six days after the conclusion of talks at Fort Qu’Appelle, Lieutenant Governor Alexander Morris and his delegation traveled to Fort Ellice and met with various other Aboriginal groups. After a brief discussion and an explanation of the treaty’s terms, the adhesion was signed. The Aboriginal communities agreed to the same terms initially agreed upon on September 15, 1874. Although they did not cede their rights to the land, government officials recorded in the written document that they had. In exchange for transfer of title, the Dominion of Canada on behalf of the Queen promised to provide one-time presents, annual annuities, reserves, farming implements, the construction of schools, and guaranteed hunting, trapping and fishing rights.

Implications
As they did not speak or write English fluently, First Nations leaders relied on interpreters and oral agreements during the negotiations. Some of these agreements were not included in the written documents. As well, the Canadian Government avoided implementing aspects of the written treaty document to curb their spending. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Discontentment surrounded the implementation of Treaty 4. In the subsequent years and decades many First Nations signatories complained that the government was not preventing starvation, preserving their livelihoods, or their sovereignty. The government was continually reluctant to uphold their end of the negotiations, in fact, utilizing discriminatory policies that would cause undue harm to Indigenous peoples.These issues stemmed from differing interpretations of the treaty and its intentions by First Nations signatories compared to the Canadian Government. The debate over the intentions of the treaties continued throughout the twentieth century and into the twenty first century. However, while the government claimed ignorance to the true intention of treaties, they were assertive and completely aware of the assimilative policies implemented, and aimed to remove Indigenous peoples from Canadian society altogether.
Sources

Morris, Alexander. The Treaties of Canada with the Indians of Manitoba and the North- West Territories Including the Negotiations on which they were based, and other Information relating thereto. Saskatoon: Fifth House, 1991. 124-125.

Sub Event
Fort Ellice
Date
1874-09-21

Opening of the Battleford Industrial School

Summary

Battleford Industrial School was opened in 1883 on the orders of the Federal Government and the recommendation of Edgar Dewdney who selected Rev. Thomas Clarke to be principal and overseer. Establishing industrial schools in the Northwest Territories was the idea of Edgar Dewdney as a response to the poor attendance within day schools. Rev. Thomas Clarke ran the school until July 1, 1895.

Implications
The site of Battleford was considered a convenient location for an industrial school by officials in Ottawa due to its location on the railway line. Rev. Thomas Clark was an English missionary who had been active in the Battlefords region since October 15, 1877, by which time he had already opened the first day school in the region and spent time conducting religious services in Cree. Despite his experience teaching in day schools, Clarke had no formal teaching training and lacked a background in educational administration. The Battleford Industrial school was initially met with suspicion from the local Aboriginal community and the parents of children who objected to the long years of estrangement from their children. With time, parents began to yield to coercion and the industrial school flourished. Fearing a reaction from the Aboriginal community, departmental officials never enforced the regulation of compulsory attendance. This led to a further decline in enrollments after 1900.
Date
1883-10-00

Sheer Compulsion Policy

Summary

After the Conservatives returned to power in 1878, Edgar Dewdney was appointed to the newly created position of Commissioner of Indian Affairs for the North West Territories. Using this powerful position Dewdney implemented a policy he referred to as “sheer compulsion.” The policy entailed withholding rations and agricultural equipment (promised in many treaties) from First Nations that opposed the government’s actions or decrees. Furthermore, he incarcerated chiefs and restricted movement and gatherings between bands. As the name suggests this policy was meant to ensure compulsion to the will of the government.


 

Result

Policy resulted in great hardship, and exemplifies a complete disregard for treaty promises and the intentions of Dewdney and other officials. In fact, limiting and withholding rations failed to meet the agreements outlined in the numbered treaties  in spite of the  obligation to provide aid. In certain uses of the Sheer Compulsion policy, First Nation peoples resisted or rioted in order to attain rations that were being withheld due to desperation and hunger.  


 

Sources

House of Commons, Ottawa, Sessional Papers, XVII (1885)

Fill

 

Date
1878-00-00
Region

Creation of File Hills Colony

Summary

In an attempt to continue the government's goals of assimilation and segregation, graduates from the File Hills Boarding School and Qu’Appelle Industrial School were selected as part of a farming colony, which was established on prime agricultural land in the Peepeekisis reserve. Officials recognized that older generations of Aboriginal people would likely not embrace a Euro-Canadian way of life, so instead they focused their assimilative efforts on young people. In addition, it was believed that after having attended residential schools, Western-educated Indigenous people would cease to visit their home reserves and leave the influence of their family. Promising graduates from these two schools, both male and female, were selected to be part of the farming colony, and were made to marry each other to create ideal farming homes. In its first year of operations, the File Hills Colony consisted of three families who were each provided with a $125 loan to purchase farming supplies. They were encouraged to participate in acceptable Euro-Canadian practices, and forbidden from interacting with other Indigenous people who engaged in traditional cultural practices.

Implications
As demonstrated in the writings of American Frederick Abbott (see "relevant resources" below), this colony was used as a prime example of the success of Canadian policy as it relates to Indigenous peoples. Although, the model of the colony never spread to other parts of the province. Many of the Aboriginal people who were recruited to live in this colony did not meet the government's standards of ideal behaviour for "civilized" people or farmers, often returning to their families, home reserves and participating in traditional cultural activities.
Sources

Canada. Sessional Papers. Year End Reports of the Department of Indian Affairs for the Year ended 31 March 1910; 1911; 1912; 1913. Brass, Eleanor. “The File Hills Ex-Pupil Colony.” Saskatchewan History 6 (1953). Carter, Sarah. “Demonstrating Success: The File Hills Farm Colony.” Prairie Forum 16.2 (1991).

Date
1901-00-00

Treaty 6

Summary

After negotiations were completed at Fort Carlton, Lieutenant-Governor Alexander Morris traveled to Fort Pitt and opened dialogue with additional Aboriginal leaders such as Chief Sweet Grass, and Chief Beardy of the Willow Cree Band regarding Treaty 6 . After four days various signatories signed adhesions to Treaty 6. -------------- Although Indigenous people did not cede their rights to the land, government officials recorded in the written document that they had. In exchange for transfer of title the Dominion of Canada on behalf of the Queen promised to provide one-time presents, annual annuities, annual salaries for chiefs, reserves, farming implements, the construction of schools, aid (in times of famine/epidemic) and guarantees of hunting, trapping and fishing rights.

Implications
Treaty 6 negotiations resulted in Alexander Morris making two new concessions. He agreed to aid the signatory groups in times of pestilence and famine. Furthermore, he agreed to provide medical assistance to Indian communities. ------------- In Robert Talbot's biography on Morris, he writes that, "Implementing the other treaties Morris had negotiated proved equally difficult. The logistical problems facing the implementation of Treaties 3-6 mirrored those of Treaties 1 and 2, but were compounded by the even greater distance from the supply management centre at Fort Garry. Similar disagreements arose between Morris and Ottawa as to how much should be spent on agricultural implements. Disagreement over Treaties 5 and 6, particularly, intensified as Morris took on an increased role in directing treaty implementation from late 1875 to early 1877. ----------------- Chiefs and councillors began to complain early on over unfulfilled treaty promises, including a lack of reserves, provisions, and agricultural implements. They came to Morris in part because his position as the principle negotiator and representative of the Crown, but also because of his personal reputation for fairness and sympathy." Pg 146.
Sub Event
Fort Pitt
Date
1876-09-09
Community